Saturday, March 5, 2011

Tussle over SB 375 target for Southern California resolved, but funding challenges remain


...
There were strings attached to the Southern California targets.  Voting 29-21, the SCAG Regional Council had rejected these proposed targets on September 2, prior to their being adopted by ARB.  The Regional Council instead supported milder targets of -6 percent in 2020 and -8 percent in 2035, maintaining that targets any more ambitious than these would be appropriate only if several conditions were met.  But ARB, which had a September 30 deadline to meet, affirmed its commitment to the more ambitious targets of -8 and -13 percent proposed by agency staff.
That commitment was, however, accompanied by a compromise facilitated by Riverside Mayor Ron Loveridge, who sits on ARB.  SCAG capitulated on the -8 percent target for 2020, but final acceptance of the -13 percent target for 2035 was conditioned on the outcome of further discussion between ARB and SCAG.  The issue remained unresolved until recently.  What is interesting is not so much the fact that a resolution was reached, but the manner in which it was reached and how it reflects the challenges moving forward.


California to Reduce Carbon Emissions by...
Banning Black Cars?!, by Chuck “Caveman” Coker
more about urban sustainability:

Urban Design After Oil

TOWARDS A SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT SYSTEM: PLANNING FOR NON-MOTORIZED VEHICLES IN CITIES

Neighbourhood planning and sustainability: mutually exclusive?

No comments:

Post a Comment