Why are some modern cities removing sidewalks? Are shared spaces good for mobility?

Some cities are getting rid of sidewalks—one of the fundamental elements of urban life? In a world where pedestrian safety and walkability are hot topics, the idea of removing sidewalks might sound crazy, dangerous, or even counterintuitive. After all, sidewalks are supposed to protect pedestrians from cars, create walkable communities, and encourage sustainable transport.

Yet, cities across the world—from London to Tokyo—have begun experimenting with shared space designs that eliminate sidewalks and traditional road boundaries altogether. This radical approach is intended to slow down traffic, reduce accidents, and create more engaging urban environments. But does it actually work? Let’s take a closer look at some of the most famous examples of sidewalk removal and what they can teach us about the future of city planning.

 

The Concept of Shared Space

The movement to remove sidewalks comes from a design philosophy called “shared space.” The idea was popularized by Dutch traffic engineer Hans Monderman, who argued that strict divisions between cars, pedestrians, and cyclists often make streets less safe. When drivers rely too much on traffic signals, curbs, and road signs, they pay less attention to their surroundings. However, when those barriers are removed, drivers become more cautious, slow down, and interact more with pedestrians.

Shared space isn’t just about removing sidewalks—it’s about removing signs, signals, and even road markings to create a more natural, organic flow of movement. Several cities have taken this approach to the extreme by completely eliminating sidewalks in key areas. Let’s explore some of the most notable examples.

 

1. Exhibition Road, London, UK

One of the most famous examples of sidewalk removal is Exhibition Road in London. This street, home to landmarks like the Natural History Museum and Victoria and Albert Museum, was once a congested, car-dominated area with traditional sidewalks and crosswalks.

In 2012, London redesigned the road, replacing sidewalks with a single-level surface covered in elegant granite paving. Pedestrians, cyclists, and cars now share the same space, with no clear separation between them.

These were the results:

• Traffic speeds dropped significantly, making the area safer for pedestrians.
• Pedestrian numbers increased by 30% as people felt more comfortable walking in the space.
• Accidents decreased, proving that the shared space concept could actually improve safety.

But not everyone is a fan. Critics argue that it can be confusing for visually impaired individuals who rely on curbs for navigation.

 

2. Delft, Netherlands – The Birthplace of Shared Space

The Netherlands has been a global leader in shared space design. The city of Delft pioneered some of the first experiments in sidewalk-free urban planning, particularly in its historic city center.

What changed?

• Sidewalks were removed to encourage seamless movement between pedestrians and vehicles.
• Streets were narrowed to make cars naturally slow down.
• Bicycle lanes and pedestrian-priority areas were emphasized.

The result? A more pedestrian-friendly environment, even though cars are still technically allowed to drive through. The city proved that removing sidewalks doesn’t necessarily mean reducing walkability—it can actually enhance it!

 

3. Bohmte, Germany – A Town Without Sidewalks

In 2007, the German town of Bohmte completely removed traffic lights, sidewalks, and road signs from its main street. The goal was to create a more organic and natural traffic flow where everyone—drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians—had to rely on eye contact and human interaction to navigate.

The effects were shocking:

• The number of traffic accidents dropped drastically.
• Average car speeds decreased to about 30 km/h (18 mph).
• Pedestrians felt safer and more empowered in the space.

Bohmte’s success inspired other European cities to experiment with similar sidewalk-free zones.

 

4. Poynton, UK – Revitalizing a Town Center

The small town of Poynton in England had a major problem: its central intersection was choked with heavy congestion and pedestrian-unfriendly infrastructure. In 2012, urban planners removed traditional sidewalks, crosswalks, and even traffic lights, replacing them with a shared space design.

Key results:

• Traffic congestion dropped significantly, even though cars still passed through.
• Pedestrian movement became easier, with fewer barriers.
• The local economy improved as people spent more time in the town center instead of rushing through.

Many locals initially hated the idea, but over time, they began to appreciate the slower speeds and improved pedestrian experience.

 

5. Tokyo, Japan – Transforming Sidewalks Into Public Spaces

In bustling Tokyo, sidewalks haven’t been removed completely, but in areas like Ginza, something different happens. On weekends, the city closes roads to cars and turns major streets into pedestrian-only zones.

By the numbers:

• This concept, called “Hokōsha Tengoku” (Pedestrian Paradise), attracts over 100,000 pedestrians every weekend.
• Major roads like Chuo-dori are converted into public plazas with seating, greenery, and open space.
• Businesses along these streets see a surge in sales, as people spend more time shopping and dining.x

Tokyo’s experiment shows that cities don’t necessarily need to remove sidewalks entirely—instead, they can reimagine them as flexible spaces.

 

The Debate: Should More Cities Remove Sidewalks?

While these examples show promising results, the idea of removing sidewalks remains controversial. Critics argue that:

• Accessibility issues arise for people with disabilities who rely on curbs and signals.
• Shared spaces can be confusing, especially for tourists and elderly pedestrians.
• Some locations still need clear pedestrian zones to maintain safety.

However, proponents argue that:

• Shared spaces make streets safer by slowing down cars.
• Pedestrians feel more empowered when they’re not restricted to narrow sidewalks.
• Cities become more dynamic and engaging when traditional road divisions are removed.

 

Conclusion: The Future of Sidewalks

So, will sidewalks disappear completely in the future? Probably not. But urban planners are rethinking the role of sidewalks, transforming streets into more flexible, people-centered spaces. The success of cities like Delft, Bohmte, and London suggests that removing sidewalks can work in the right context—but it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution.

The real takeaway? Cities need to prioritize people over cars. Whether that means removing sidewalks, widening them, or redesigning streets entirely, the goal is the same: creating safer, more livable, and walkable urban environments.

Read more about pedestrianization:

The Association between Regular Use of Ridesourcing and Walking Mode Choice in Cairo and Tehran

Urban travel characteristics in relation with jobs-housing balance and accessibility: results of a survey in Lahore, Pakistan

Liveable Neighbourhoods: Street Layout, Design and Traffic Management Guidelines

A “STEP” TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT: A CASE STUDY OF PENANG, MALAYSIA

Urban mass murder: Top 5 countries with the highest WWI urban casualties

World War I was one of the most catastrophic events in human history. By the time the guns fell silent in 1918, more than 16 million people were dead, and another 20 million were wounded worldwide. The war didn’t just redraw borders or alter political systems; it reshaped the fabric of societies, leaving permanent scars on cities and their populations. Across Europe, cities bore a significant share of these losses. Urban deaths accounted for nearly 40% of the total casualties in many countries, highlighting the toll on densely populated areas, where war, disease, and economic collapse intersected. This is the story of how World War I impacted Europe’s urban centers, focusing on the countries that suffered the greatest losses and their cities that bore the brunt of this devastating conflict.

While much attention is given to the battlefield and rural devastation of World War I, the war’s impact on Europe’s urban populations is often overlooked. Cities, the economic and cultural hubs of nations, faced unprecedented challenges. From bombings and conscription to disease outbreaks and food shortages, urban centers endured tremendous human and infrastructural losses. This video examines the effects of the war on urban populations, ranking the five European countries that experienced the highest urban death tolls. Through this ranking, we’ll uncover the socio-economic and political conditions that framed the war’s impact on these cities and the lasting transformations they underwent.

World War I left an indelible mark on Europe’s urban populations. Cities that were once bustling with life became places of mourning and rebuilding, as millions of urban residents perished in the conflict. The war reshaped Europe’s cities, disrupting economies, altering demographics, and leaving scars that are still visible today. From the industrial hubs of Germany to the cultural heart of France and the revolutionary streets of St. Petersburg, the impact of the war on Europe’s urban centers was profound, forever altering the course of their histories.

More about urban population:

The top 10 largest cities of the 19th century based on population

Planning and Urban Design for a Liveable High-Density City

Drivers of urban sprawl in two large Middle-eastern countries: literature on Iran and Egypt

The Status of Urban and Suburban Sprawl in Egypt and Iran

A REGIONAL ANALYSIS OF URBAN POPULATION AND TRANSPORT ENERGY CONSUMPTION

Changes in population settlement pattern in urban system of Tehran province (1966 to 2006)

A New Role for Urban Planning in a Changing Environmental Climate

The top 10 largest cities of the 19th century based on population

What did the world’s cities look like in the 19th century, a time of revolutions, empires, and unprecedented growth? In an era where industrialization changed the face of the planet, some urban centers exploded in size, becoming bustling hubs of industry, trade, and political power. But these population booms came at a cost—overcrowding, poverty, and social unrest were the norm for many. Today, we’ll take you on a journey back in time to uncover the 10 largest cities of the 19th century, revealing not only their staggering populations but also the fascinating socio-economic and political backdrops that made them global titans. Stick around to see how these cities shaped the modern urban world.

More about population:

Planning and Urban Design for a Liveable High-Density City

Drivers of urban sprawl in two large Middle-eastern countries: literature on Iran and Egypt

URBANIZATION TRENDS AND URBAN PLANNING STRATEGIES IN THREE MAJOR MIDDLE EASTERN COUNTRIES: IRAN, EGYPT, AND TURKEY

The Status of Urban and Suburban Sprawl in Egypt and Iran

Top 10 Cities with the Highest Car Ownership Rates and Their Struggles Against Car Dependency

 

Imagine cities where cars outnumber people, where the hum of engines defines the rhythm of life. These urban landscapes tell stories of sprawling highways, congested streets, and a culture deeply rooted in car dependency. But what shaped these cities, and how are they grappling with the consequences?

Introduction

Urban congestion isn’t just frustrating; it’s a sign of deeper urban planning challenges. From sprawling suburbs to car-centric policies, the cities with the highest car ownership rates reveal stories of economic growth, cultural trends, and transportation policies gone awry. Each city’s car dependency comes with unique consequences, from chronic traffic jams to innovative solutions to combat congestion.

In this video you find a ranking of ten cities with the highest car ownership rates. The cities in the ranking are only larger or international cities, while smaller cities have not been considered. The larger the car ownership rates are, the more dependent cars the cities are. The four elements of traffic status, transportation modal share, the causes of car dependency, and solutions and policies have been considered for all ten cities. Let’s look at the ranking together.

 

10. Tokyo, Japan: Urban Efficiency Amidst Ownership

Traffic Insights: Tokyo’s dense network of roads sees an average congestion level of 41%, with peak hours causing drivers to spend 46 minutes daily stuck in traffic.

Transportation Modal Share: Despite its 310 cars per 1,000 residents, Tokyo is a global leader in public transport usage. 85% of daily trips are made on trains, buses, and subways, powered by systems like the Yamanote Line, which moves 3.8 million passengers daily.

Causes of Car Dependency: Tokyo’s post-war economic boom transformed cars into status symbols. The sprawling Kanto region also relies on car ownership due to suburban expansion, though high parking fees and limited space deter excess use within the city core.

Solutions and Policies: Tokyo’s unique proof of parking requirement mandates that car buyers demonstrate ownership of a parking spot. Heavy investments in transit, including 12 Metro lines and 11 suburban railways, have created one of the most balanced mobility ecosystems globally.

 

9. Los Angeles, USA: Freeways to Gridlock

Traffic Insights: Los Angeles is synonymous with gridlock, with 62 hours annually lost to congestion per driver and an average commute time of 53 minutes.

Transportation Modal Share: With 640 cars per 1,000 residents, LA’s transit usage stands at just 6%, while 76% of residents commute by car—a stark contrast to its vibrant past as a rail-oriented city in the early 20th century.

Causes of Car Dependency: The post-war suburban boom and the infamous dismantling of the Pacific Electric Railway created a car-dominated urban sprawl. Housing policies and zoning laws further prioritized highways and single-family homes over dense, transit-friendly development.

Solutions and Policies: LA’s ongoing $88 billion Measure M initiative aims to reverse car dependency by expanding rail and bus networks. Projects like the Regional Connector Transit Project are set to integrate existing transit lines for seamless city-wide coverage.

 

8. Munich, Germany: Cars and Sustainability in Tandem

Traffic Insights: Munich experiences a moderate congestion rate of 27%, with peak delays adding up to 34 hours annually for drivers.

Transportation Modal Share: Although 580 cars per 1,000 residents are registered, over 70% of trips within Munich are made by bike, on foot, or via public transport. The S-Bahn and U-Bahn systems carry over 500 million passengers annually.

Causes of Car Dependency: Munich’s affluence, coupled with its automotive heritage as BMW’s headquarters, drives high car ownership. The city’s mixed-use development patterns, however, mitigate some of the typical effects of car dependency.

Solutions and Policies: Munich has invested heavily in its cycling infrastructure, with 300 kilometers of bike lanes and car-free zones in historic districts. Low-emission zones and incentives for electric vehicles are also reducing pollution from private cars.

 

7. Dubai, UAE: Cars as a Status Symbol

Traffic Insights: Dubai faces average congestion levels of 38%, with delays costing drivers 62 hours annually.

Transportation Modal Share: The city’s 540 cars per 1,000 residents contrast with its burgeoning public transit network. The Dubai Metro, spanning 75 kilometers, serves over 200 million riders annually, yet private car use dominates 80% of commutes.

Causes of Car Dependency: Rapid urbanization in the 1990s prioritized highways and car-centric infrastructure. Fuel subsidies and low vehicle import taxes further incentivized car ownership in this desert metropolis.

Solutions and Policies: Dubai has implemented toll systems like Salik and plans to expand metro and bus coverage under its 2040 Urban Master Plan. Recent initiatives also focus on creating walkable neighborhoods and integrating autonomous vehicles.

 

6. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: A City Stuck in Traffic

Traffic Insights: Kuala Lumpur has some of Southeast Asia’s worst congestion, with drivers spending 92 hours annually in traffic.

Transportation Modal Share: While 670 cars per 1,000 residents highlight car dominance, only 20% of daily trips are made on public transport despite significant investments in systems like the MRT and LRT.

Causes of Car Dependency: The city’s post-independence development favored suburban sprawl, with insufficient focus on integrated transit. Rising incomes during the 1990s further cemented car ownership as a symbol of success.

Solutions and Policies: The government’s Mass Rapid Transit project has added over 150 kilometers of rail since 2017. Future plans aim to increase the transit modal share to 40% by 2030.

 

5. Toronto, Canada: Gridlocked Suburbia

Traffic Insights: Toronto’s congestion ranks among North America’s worst, with drivers losing 142 hours annually to traffic delays.

Transportation Modal Share: With 740 cars per 1,000 residents, Toronto’s transit usage is at 23%, supported by systems like the TTC and GO Transit. However, 64% of residents rely on cars for commuting.

Causes of Car Dependency: Decades of suburban sprawl and car-centric infrastructure, combined with insufficient transit expansion, have created a heavy reliance on vehicles.

Solutions and Policies: Toronto’s SmartTrack project and expansion of the Eglinton Crosstown LRT aim to add over 75 kilometers of rail by 2030. Urban densification strategies are also being implemented to reduce reliance on private cars.

 

4. Singapore: Managing Cars with Precision

Traffic Insights: Singapore has remarkably low congestion levels for a dense city, with drivers spending just 50 hours annually in traffic.

Transportation Modal Share: With 390 cars per 1,000 residents, 80% of trips are made on public transit thanks to the efficient MRT and bus networks.

Causes of Car Dependency: While Singapore discourages excessive car ownership through its COE system, wealth and affluence still drive demand for luxury vehicles.

Solutions and Policies: Singapore’s world-class Land Transport Master Plan focuses on increasing rail capacity to 360 kilometers by 2040 and expanding bike-friendly zones. Toll systems like ERP further reduce road congestion.

 

3. Houston, USA: Freeways Over Freedom

Traffic Insights: Houston ranks among the most congested U.S. cities, with drivers losing 83 hours annually to gridlock.

Transportation Modal Share: With 850 cars per 1,000 residents, Houston’s transit ridership is just 6%, while 78% of commutes are car-based.

Causes of Car Dependency: Houston’s low-density zoning laws and emphasis on freeway expansion have made driving a necessity.

Solutions and Policies: The city is expanding its METRORail system and enhancing bike lanes, but its car-first culture poses significant challenges for change.

 

2. Perth, Australia: A Car-Dependent Outback

Traffic Insights: Perth’s congestion leads to 68 hours of annual delays per driver.

Transportation Modal Share: While 870 cars per 1,000 residents dominate, the city’s transit modal share is just 15%. Public systems like Transperth are underutilized due to sprawling suburban development.

Causes of Car Dependency: Perth’s geographic isolation and preference for low-density housing have historically favored cars.

Solutions and Policies: The Metronet project aims to double the rail network, focusing on connectivity and sustainable urban growth.

 

1. San Marino: Tiny Nation, Big Car Numbers

Traffic Insights: San Marino’s small size means minimal congestion, but narrow roads face frequent backups due to its high car density.

Transportation Modal Share: With 1,263 cars per 1,000 residents, public transport is virtually nonexistent, and cycling infrastructure is limited.

Causes of Car Dependency: Wealth, limited alternatives, and challenging terrain have cemented car ownership as a necessity.

Solutions and Policies: Discussions on electric shuttles and sustainable tourism initiatives aim to address some of these issues.

 

Conclusion

From Tokyo’s rail-heavy balance to Houston’s freeway dependence, these cities reflect the complex interplay between car ownership and urban planning. Addressing congestion, reducing emissions, and improving quality of life require bold, innovative approaches to transportation planning. The question remains: can we make cities less about cars and more about people?

More about urban transportation:

Which city built the first bike lane? A Tale of Bicycles, Cars, and Urban Revolution

Bangkok’s traffic congestion: How can public transport help?

How Shipping Containers Revolutionized Urban Life

Roundabouts vs. Intersections: Which One Rules the Road?

Urban travel characteristics in relation with jobs-housing balance and accessibility: results of a survey in Lahore, Pakistan

Improving the Pedestrian Environment Through Innovative Transportation Design

The bicycle's long way to China: The appropriation of cycling as a foreign cultural technique (1860-1941)

Europe’s 10 Most treasurous Tramway Systems Ranked

Tramways are the lifeblood of European cities, blending historical legacy, architectural beauty, and cutting-edge transit technology. More than a means of transport, they represent a city’s identity and vision for sustainable urban living. In this script, we dive deep into 10 of Europe’s most attractive and advanced tramway systems, ranking them based on functionality, historical significance, aesthetics, and environmental impact. Each one tells a unique story of how cities evolve with their trams.

10. Porto, Portugal – A Journey Through Time

Points: 72/100

Porto’s tram system feels like a ride through a living museum. Established in 1872, these trams were once the backbone of the city’s public transport. Today, only three lines remain operational, but their importance lies in preserving a piece of Portugal’s history. Visitors are drawn to their vintage charm, complete with polished wooden interiors and brass fittings that evoke the trams’ golden age.

The Line 1 route, running along the scenic Douro River, offers breathtaking views of the Luís I Bridge and the colorful facades of Porto’s Ribeira district. Each stop reveals layers of Porto’s rich history, from its medieval past to its maritime heritage. While the network covers only 15 kilometers, it creates an unforgettable journey for both locals and tourists.

Porto’s tram system is bolstered by the Porto Tram Museum, housed in a former power station. Here, visitors can explore over 20 preserved tram cars, some dating back to the late 19th century. This museum ensures that Porto’s tram legacy remains alive, even as modern forms of transit take precedence in the city.

Despite its small size, Porto’s tram system captivates with its unique character and historical depth. While not the most advanced, it serves as a nostalgic window into a bygone era.

 

9. Gothenburg, Sweden – The Green Machine

Points: 75/100

Gothenburg’s tram system is a shining example of Scandinavian sustainability. Launched in 1879, it now boasts 190 kilometers of track, making it the largest network in Scandinavia. It supports 13 lines, connecting the city center to sprawling suburban areas. Modern low-floor trams dominate the fleet, offering easy access to passengers with disabilities or strollers.

What sets Gothenburg apart is its commitment to environmental innovation. Powered largely by renewable energy, the system reflects Sweden’s ambition to become fossil-free by 2030. Advanced technology ensures reduced energy consumption, and the trams operate with remarkable efficiency even during the harsh Nordic winters.

The network’s cultural significance extends beyond transport. Gothenburg’s trams frequently feature public art projects, with local artists decorating stops and vehicles. During special events, like the city’s Light Festival, illuminated trams become moving art installations, capturing the imaginations of residents and visitors alike.

Gothenburg’s tramway is more than functional—it embodies Sweden’s forward-thinking approach to urban living. By blending eco-consciousness with cultural vibrancy, it sets a standard for sustainable transit.

 

8. Zurich, Switzerland – Precision Meets Elegance

Points: 78/100

Zurich’s tram system exemplifies Swiss efficiency. Introduced in 1896, it has evolved into a highly integrated network spanning 178 kilometers, with 15 lines and carrying over 400,000 passengers daily. Its punctuality and seamless connectivity to trains, buses, and ferries are legendary.

The trams operate almost entirely on renewable energy, making Zurich a leader in sustainable urban transport. The fleet includes modern, low-floor vehicles designed with passenger comfort in mind. Spacious interiors, large windows, and quiet operation enhance the commuting experience, while digital displays keep riders informed in real time.

A unique aspect of Zurich’s tram system is its role in urban planning. The trams serve as a backbone for Zurich’s car-free initiatives, encouraging residents to rely on public transit. The network’s expansion into suburban areas has also helped balance the city’s population density and reduce urban sprawl.

While Zurich’s trams lack the visual flair of Lisbon or Vienna, they impress with their functionality and environmental consciousness. They are a cornerstone of the city’s reputation for innovation and sustainability.

 

7. Berlin, Germany – History on the Rails

Points: 80/100

Berlin’s trams carry the weight of history. Established in 1865, they’ve witnessed the city’s tumultuous past, from the German Empire to the Cold War. After World War II, the tram network in West Berlin was largely dismantled, while East Berlin preserved and expanded its lines. This divide is still evident today, with trams primarily operating in the former East.

The network now includes 22 lines covering 190 kilometers, making it one of the largest in Europe. The M10 line, which links vibrant neighborhoods like Friedrichshain and Prenzlauer Berg, is particularly popular with Berlin’s young, creative crowd. Late-night trams serve as lifelines for the city’s bustling nightlife scene.

Berlin’s trams are undergoing modernization to align with the city’s environmental goals. Electric-powered trams and hybrid models are gradually replacing older vehicles, ensuring the system remains both efficient and eco-friendly. Plans for expansion aim to reconnect the tram network with former West Berlin, bridging historical divisions.

Berlin’s trams encapsulate the city’s resilience and adaptability. They serve as both a practical transport solution and a living testament to Berlin’s storied past.

 

6. Kraków, Poland – A Cultural Connector

Points: 82/100

Kraków’s tram system weaves through a city rich in history and culture. First introduced in 1882, the network has grown to include 90 kilometers of track, with modern low-floor trams making up a significant portion of the fleet. It’s an essential part of daily life for Kraków’s residents, connecting the historic Old Town to rapidly developing suburbs.

The Heritage Tram Line 0 is a highlight for visitors, offering a ride in vintage vehicles through some of Kraków’s most picturesque areas. These retro trams, with their polished wood interiors, transport passengers back to the early 20th century.

In recent years, Kraków has embraced sustainability, with over 60% of its fleet powered by renewable energy. Tram stops have been transformed into hubs of creativity, featuring public art and interactive installations. These enhancements reflect the city’s commitment to blending tradition with modernity.

Kraków’s trams are more than a transport system—they’re a cultural experience. They provide a glimpse into the city’s soul, balancing the old and the new with finesse.

 

5. Amsterdam, Netherlands – A City on the Move

Points: 85/100

Amsterdam’s trams are as integral to its identity as its canals and bicycles. Since 1875, the network has expanded to include 15 lines and over 200 kilometers of track, connecting the city’s historic center with its outer districts. Trams play a crucial role in Amsterdam’s commitment to reducing car dependency.

The fleet includes hybrid-powered models that align with the city’s environmental goals. Trams are designed for inclusivity, featuring low-floor entrances and designated spaces for bicycles—a nod to Amsterdam’s cycling culture.

A standout feature is the tram’s integration with Amsterdam’s canal system. Stops are strategically located near ferry terminals and canal tours, making it easy for visitors to explore the city. Special night trams ensure accessibility even after the city’s famous nightlife winds down.

With their iconic blue-and-white design and seamless operation, Amsterdam’s trams reflect the city’s innovative spirit. They’re a testament to how public transit can enhance urban life while preserving historical charm.

 

4. Vienna, Austria – Elegance in Motion

Points: 88/100

Vienna’s trams are a symbol of the city’s grandeur. Operating since 1865, they now form one of the world’s largest networks, with 30 lines spanning 220 kilometers. Over 300 million passengers annually rely on the system, which connects Vienna’s historic heart to its suburban edges.

The Ringstrasse tour, conducted in historic trams, is a favorite among tourists. This route encircles Vienna’s most opulent landmarks, including the State Opera, Hofburg Palace, and Parliament Building. Modern low-floor trams ensure accessibility for all passengers, while vintage models preserve the network’s historical essence.

Vienna’s commitment to sustainability is evident in its energy-efficient fleet. Solar-powered charging stations and innovative vehicle designs reduce the system’s carbon footprint. Public feedback mechanisms allow residents to shape future developments, ensuring the network evolves with the city’s needs.

Vienna’s trams are more than transport—they’re a cultural journey. They encapsulate the city’s blend of tradition, innovation, and sophistication.

 

3. Milan, Italy – Where Style Meets Function

Points: 90/100

Milan’s trams are a testament to the city’s ability to marry tradition with modernity. First introduced in 1876, the system features 17 lines covering 180 kilometers. The iconic Peter Witt streetcars, with their vintage wooden interiors, are a beloved part of Milan’s streetscape.

Modern trams are equally impressive, with sleek designs and advanced technology. Hybrid and fully electric models align with Milan’s sustainability goals, ensuring the system remains eco-friendly. Trams navigate Milan’s most famous landmarks, from the Duomo to the Sforza Castle, offering riders an unparalleled view of the city.

Special events, such as fashion week, see trams transformed into mobile runways and art galleries, bridging Milan’s love for fashion and art with everyday transit. Meanwhile, the system operates with impressive punctuality, despite the city's bustling pace.

Milan's ability to embrace its tram history while prioritizing modernization makes it a leader in urban transit innovation. The seamless integration of charm, efficiency, and environmental awareness gives Milan a well-deserved place among Europe’s top tramway systems.

 

2. Budapest, Hungary – Trams with a View

Points: 92/100

Budapest’s tram system is as iconic as the Danube River that splits the city in two. Operating since 1866, the network spans 156 kilometers and carries over 400,000 passengers daily. Its Line 2, which runs along the river, has been repeatedly voted one of the most scenic tram routes in the world, offering views of the Parliament building, Buda Castle, and Chain Bridge.

Hungary’s trams stand out for their scale and efficiency. The system operates Europe’s longest trams, the Combino Supra, which can carry up to 350 passengers. These modern vehicles are energy-efficient, ensuring the network remains eco-conscious. Despite its contemporary innovations, Budapest retains a fleet of heritage trams for special occasions, connecting riders to the city’s rich history.

The city's tram stops are a mix of historic architecture and modern functionality. The Art Nouveau designs of certain stations reflect Budapest's cultural sophistication, while newer stops prioritize accessibility and safety. The system also emphasizes connectivity, linking seamlessly to buses, metro lines, and ferries.

Budapest's trams are a window into the city’s cultural and natural beauty, making them not only a mode of transport but an essential part of the Budapest experience.

 

1. Lisbon, Portugal – The Crown Jewel of Tramways

Points: 100/100

Lisbon’s tram system is a global icon, effortlessly combining history, charm, and practicality. Established in 1873, it retains a fleet of vintage trams that have become a symbol of the city. The Route 28E, which winds through Lisbon’s narrow, hilly streets, is world-famous, offering views of Alfama, Graça, and other historic neighborhoods.

Despite its nostalgic allure, Lisbon’s trams are more than tourist attractions. The network remains a critical part of the city's transport system, covering 48 kilometers with six operational routes. Modern trams complement the vintage fleet, ensuring the system remains functional for daily commuters.

One of Lisbon’s standout features is its steep, cobblestone streets, which the trams navigate with remarkable precision. This feat of engineering, combined with the stunning backdrop of the city’s pastel-colored buildings and the Tagus River, creates an unparalleled experience. Sustainability is also a priority, with Lisbon incorporating energy-efficient models into its fleet.

Lisbon’s trams capture the heart of the city, reflecting its blend of history, innovation, and resilience. Their cultural and practical significance secures Lisbon's position as Europe’s finest tramway system.

 

Conclusion

Europe’s tramway systems are more than modes of transport—they are reflections of their cities' histories, values, and ambitions. From the innovative sustainability of Gothenburg to the scenic routes of Budapest and the timeless charm of Lisbon, these tramways demonstrate how urban transit can be both functional and inspiring. By ranking these systems, we celebrate not just their operational excellence but the unique ways they enrich the lives of millions across the continent.

 More about public transportation:

How Subways Changed Cities Forever

Top 10 Metro and Light Rail Systems in Southeast Asia Ranked

Relations of Public Transport Use and Car Ownership with Neighbourhood and City-Level Travel Purposes in Kerman, Iran

Children’s Independent Mobility to School in Seven European Countries: A Multinomial Logit Model

Urban Sprawl, Socioeconomic Features, and Travel Patterns in Middle East Countries: A Case Study in Iran