American cities have been on the rebound for about two decades now,
with once moribund residential and commercial neighborhoods springing
back to life. But despite this urban revival, industrial sites are as
dead as ever. U.S. industrial output has been steadily rising for the
last few decades, but it has come about entirely through increased
productivity as opposed to increased employment. Manufacturers have been
decamping to more suburban and rural areas for a century now, leaving
holes in the urban fabric along waterfronts and railroad lines.
Deindustrialization is common throughout the developed world, and the
traditional way of dealing with it has been to rezone industrial sites
to allow residential and commercial development. But recently,
especially in the wake of the recession and increased calls for “green
jobs,” planners have been reconsidering urban deindustrialization.
Vancouver, ever at the forefront of North American urbanism, seems to
have soured on industrial rezonings, and other cities are following suit. Emily Badger at The Atlantic Cities describes some efforts
in U.S. cities to preserve their industrial land, arguing that “when we
raze and remediate old 19th and 20th century industrial sites, maybe we
should consider keeping a lot of them zoned that way.”
similar posts:
No comments:
Post a Comment