Like Urban Research on Facebook

Showing posts with label Arizona. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arizona. Show all posts

Thursday, December 26, 2024

Why Cities Are So Hot: The Heat Island Effect

 The heat is rising, especially in our cities. Urban areas are becoming hotspots, quite literally, due to a phenomenon known as the Urban Heat Island Effect. So why are cities like Phoenix sizzling, while green spaces like Singapore are finding ways to cool down? Let’s dive into it.

The Science Behind the Heat Island Effect

Cities tend to be several degrees hotter than their surrounding rural areas. This is due to dense infrastructure, like buildings, roads, and sidewalks, which absorb and retain heat. Materials like asphalt and concrete trap heat during the day and release it slowly at night, keeping urban areas warmer even after sunset. According to the EPA, urban areas can be 1.8 to 5.4°F hotter than nearby rural areas during the day, and the difference can soar to 22°F at night.

Case Study 1: Phoenix, Arizona

Phoenix, one of the hottest cities in the U.S., is a classic example of the Urban Heat Island effect. With summer temperatures often surpassing 110°F (43°C), it’s not just uncomfortable; it’s dangerous. The city has less than 10% tree cover, making it harder to cool down naturally. Studies show that areas with more trees and vegetation can be up to 10°F cooler than their surroundings. The lack of greenery, combined with endless concrete surfaces, makes Phoenix a furnace. In response, the city is trying to introduce “cool pavements” that reflect sunlight and reduce surface temperatures by up to 10-12°F. Yet, the challenge remains significant, as temperatures continue to rise, putting the city’s residents at risk of heat-related illnesses.

Impact on Public Health

The heat isn't just a comfort issue; it's a health crisis. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, extreme heat is one of the leading causes of weather-related deaths in the U.S., with around 700 deaths per year. In Phoenix alone, heat-related deaths reached a record high of 425 in 2022. Vulnerable populations like the elderly, children, and low-income families are most affected. The heat also strains energy resources as air conditioning units run non-stop, increasing both electricity bills and carbon emissions.

Case Study 2: Singapore’s Green Solutions

Now, let’s head over to Singapore, a city that’s turning green to fight the heat. Singapore is using innovative strategies like green roofs, vertical gardens, and tree-lined streets to lower urban temperatures. More than 100 hectares of rooftop space in the city have been converted to green roofs. Studies show that green roofs can reduce indoor temperatures by up to 5-7°F, lowering energy costs by 20-30% for cooling.

The city’s “Park Connector Network” integrates green spaces into urban planning, creating a natural cooling system. This approach doesn’t just reduce temperatures; it also improves air quality and biodiversity. Singapore has managed to keep its city relatively cooler, proving that urbanization doesn’t have to come at the expense of the environment. It’s a model that many other cities are starting to replicate.

Why Trees and Parks Matter

According to research, just increasing tree cover by 10% in urban areas can reduce temperatures by 2.5-3°F. Parks, green roofs, and urban forests serve as natural air conditioners, providing shade and releasing moisture into the air. A study from the University of Wisconsin found that residents living near parks reported feeling 5-7°F cooler during heatwaves.

Cities like Los Angeles are taking this seriously by planting 90,000 new trees to combat urban heat. New York City has its Million Trees NYC initiative, aiming to increase urban greenery. These efforts show that it’s possible to mitigate the effects of the Heat Island Effect through strategic planning.

The Road Ahead: Sustainable Urban Planning

The solution to urban heat isn’t just about planting trees; it’s about rethinking how we build cities. Urban planners are focusing on creating more walkable, bike-friendly, and green spaces. Strategies like using reflective materials in construction, implementing green walls, and redesigning public spaces are becoming more common. According to the International Energy Agency, sustainable urban planning could reduce the world’s energy consumption for cooling by 25% by 2050.

Conclusion

Cities are getting hotter, but they don’t have to be. By learning from places like Singapore and rethinking the way we build our urban spaces, we can cool down our cities and create more livable environments. The future of urban living doesn’t have to be sweltering—it can be green, sustainable, and cool.

More about urban environment:

The Evolution of Streetlights: How They Shaped Our Cities

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

The Costs of Sprawl Reconsidered: What the Data Really Show

by Wendell Cox and Joshua Utt

The Costs of Sprawl? The “anti-sprawl” movement has received much attention in recent years, and has been successful in implementing its “smart growth” policies in some areas. Much of the justification for the current campaign against the lowdensity (sprawling) urban development that Americans and Western Europeans prefer is based upon assumptions that it is more costly than the more dense development of central cities. A federally financed research project (Costs of Sprawl) concluded that we can no longer afford sprawling development and that failure to force more dense development in the next quarter-century would impose more than $225 billion in additional costs. Current Urban Planning Assumptions. The urban planning profession generally contends that the following assumptions (called in this paper Current Urban Planning Assumptions) are compelling reasons why greater control should be exercised over land use to fight urban sprawl.
1. Lower spending will be associated with higher population densities.
2. Lower spending will be associated with lower rates of population growth.
3. Lower spending will be associated with older municipalities.
Research to Date. Most of the research on which these assumptions are based is theoretical, projecting standard costs into the future. It makes no attempt to test the actual expenditures of more dense, slower growing, and older municipalities ompared to municipalities with the suburban land-use patterns that have developed over the past half-century. The research contained in this paper examines the actual data on municipal expenditures and finds that the Current Urban Planning Assumptions are unreliable and that other factors—principally, variations in employee compensation per capita—explain virtually all of the variation in municipal expenditures. However, before describing this research, it is important to examine the Costs of Sprawl claims. Although $225 billion in additional costs sounds like a lot (and there are many questions regarding this claim), the cost is actually modest because it is spread over a quarter-century and an average of 115 million households. In fact, in the last 20 years, the average annual increase in local government expenditures in the United States has been 25 times the annual Costs of Sprawl projection.


more about urban sprawl:

Do We Really All Have To Live Like New Yorkers? Does Density Matter?

Five Myths About Sprawl: a review of "Sprawl: A Compact History"

SOME REALITIES ABOUT SPRAWL AND URBAN DECLINE

Cleanliness from a car

New Urbanism: A Salve or Bane to Urban Wounds?

Suburban Immigrants Feel Arizona Heat

Monday, March 7, 2011

BICYCLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN- City of Peoria, Arizona


The Traffic Engineering staff, with the assistance of Sprinkle Consulting, Inc., Coffman Studios and HDR Inc., has completed this Bicycle Development Plan to provide the City of Peoria with a “blueprint” for the continuing development of its network of on-street bicycle facilities. In the course of preparing this plan, the consultant team performed an evaluation of bicycling conditions on the City’s roadway network and, where necessary, made recommendations toward improving bicycling conditions on specific segments. Various “Bicycle Friendly” practices and policies in use across Maricopa County, Arizona, and the rest of the United States were also reviewed and summarized. The consultant team, drawing upon input from City staff and residents, recommends certain policies and practices that are appropriate to the goals and objectives articulated in the City’s General Plan and other documents.
The consultant team evaluated bicycling conditions on Peoria’s roadway network using the Bicycle Level of Service Model, a methodology adopted by numerous municipal, county and state planning agencies and departments of transportation across the country. In consultation with city staff, a target level of bicycle accommodation—equal to or better than a score of “C” (<3.5) in the Bicycle Level of Service evaluation—was chosen for the city. On average, the city’s arterial streets scored a “D” (3.7) on the evaluation, which does not meet the targeted level of accommodation for bicyclists. The consultant team analyzed the traffic and geometric conditions of the segments that did not meet the target level of accommodation (approximately 70 miles in length) and is recommending strategies for improving conditions for bicyclists on those segments. There are five recommended strategies:
• Re-striping of roadways for bike lanes or shoulders (19 miles)
• Posting “Share the Road” signage (3 miles)
• Adding or expanding paved shoulders (10 miles)
• Performing detailed corridor studies to investigate the possibility of sidepath construction
(28 miles)
• Performing detailed corridor study to investigate alternative solutions for especially constrained roadway segments (13 miles)
After identifying the appropriate improvement strategies for each roadway segment, the consultant team prepared a prioritized list of potential improvements, using a neo-traditional Benefit-Cost Index, which weighs various benefits (potential improvement in bicycle accommodation, potential demand for a bicycle facility along that specific segment, and any citizen-identified needs for improvement on that segment) against an estimated cost for the type of improvement recommended for each segment. The results of the Benefit-Cost Index were used to group the improvement recommendations into three “tiers” of short-, medium-, and longrange projects. The mileage and estimated cost of these various tiers is as follows:
• Tier I (short-term projects): 29 miles, $2.4 million
• Tier II (mid-range projects): 18 miles, $13.7 million
• Tier III (long-range projects): 14 miles, $24.3 million
While this Bicycle Development Plan has established priorities for implementation of bicycle facility improvements on the City’s roadway network, it will be important for city staff to be alert to opportunities to include bicycle improvements in new development and roadway reconstruction projects, so that public transportation investment benefits can be maximized and future needs for retro-fitting can be reduced.
The policy recommendations included in this plan address enacting a performance-based standard for accommodating bicyclists on Peoria’s streets, as well as updating the City’s planning procedures and development standards to facilitate the development of new bicycle facilities throughout the City.


Peoria, Arizona, by Hanroanu

some posts about bicycle planning:

Bicycles on Maryland’s Eastern Shore: Power and Passion

Sights and details from the 2011 NJ Bike and Walk Summit

More Biking Lessons from Portland

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Suburban Immigrants Feel Arizona Heat

via burb

On Long Island, native residents have an ambivalent attitude toward immigration. Though they employ undocumented workers by the thousands--New York state harbors a greater percentage of illegal aliens than Arizona (five percent versus four percent of the national total from 2000 to 2006)--Long Island has become a flashpoint for anti-immigrant protest.

In 2005, the town of Farmingville was the site of one of the most controversial day-laborer shape-ups that have raised suburbanites' ire. On the exurban frontier of eastern Long Island, a tense court case recently wrapped up with the conviction of a teenager who knifed a man while "beaner hopping"--targeting Latino immigrants as a violent lark. Last week, an SUV was spotted in Nassau County with a homemade bumper sticker that read, "Go Arizona."

read more 


Downtown Tuscon, Arizona, photo by Ken Lund
more about suburbs:

In Charleston, an Affordable, Effective Alternative to Highway Expansion

Do We Really All Have To Live Like New Yorkers? Does Density Matter?

The Definitions and Characteristics of Urban Sprawl