Like Urban Research on Facebook

Showing posts with label Vietnam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vietnam. Show all posts

Friday, January 16, 2026

6 capital cities completely designed and built by colonial empires

Some of the world’s largest cities were never meant to serve their native populations. Instead, they were designed by foreign rulers to control land, extract wealth, and reinforce imperial dominance. Over 100 major cities worldwide were planned and constructed by colonial powers, many of which remain economic and political hubs today. But how did these cities emerge? How were they planned? And how much of their colonial legacy still lingers? Today, we uncover the most significant cities built by colonial powers—and the lasting impact they have had on the modern world.

 


Methodology: Defining Colonial Cities and Their Criteria

Before diving into specific cities, let's define what we mean by a colonial city. Colonialism involved powerful nations exerting control over foreign lands, often through military conquest, economic exploitation, and political dominance. These colonial powers needed administrative and trade centers, so they designed new cities rather than relying on existing indigenous settlements.

For this video, we classify a colonial city using three criteria:

  • It was planned and built primarily by colonial authorities.
  • It served as an administrative, military, or trade hub for the empire.
  • It incorporated European-style urban planning, including grid layouts, segregated districts, and monumental government structures.

Now, let’s explore some of the most historically significant cities that fit this definition.

 

1. New Delhi, India (British Empire)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~32 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~1,484 km²
πŸ’° Cost of Construction (1911): £4 million (Equivalent to ~£500 million today)

In 1911, the British colonial government decided to move India’s capital from Calcutta to New Delhi, aiming to create a symbol of British power. Designed by Sir Edwin Lutyens and Herbert Baker, New Delhi was built with wide boulevards, European-style government buildings, and geometric road patterns. It was intended to be a monument to British authority, segregating colonial rulers from the native Indian population.

Post-independence, New Delhi remained India’s capital, and today it is one of the world’s largest metropolitan areas, with a booming economy and a blend of colonial and modernist architecture.

 

2. Jakarta, Indonesia (Dutch East Indies)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~11 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~661 km²
πŸš† Dutch-built canals: Over 110 km (many still in use today)

Originally named Batavia, Jakarta was founded in 1619 by the Dutch East India Company (VOC). The Dutch meticulously planned the city with Amsterdam-style canals, aiming to facilitate trade and military defense. However, these canals became disease-ridden, leading to devastating malaria outbreaks in the 18th and 19th centuries.

Post-independence, Jakarta grew into Indonesia’s economic powerhouse, but colonial infrastructure contributed to its severe flooding problems, as many canals were poorly maintained or repurposed for informal housing.

 

3. Hanoi, Vietnam (French Indochina)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~8 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~3,358 km²
πŸ› French-built districts: 4 major colonial zones

Under French rule (1887–1954), Hanoi was transformed into the administrative capital of French Indochina. The French introduced:

  • Boulevards mimicking Paris, such as the iconic TrΓ ng Tiền Street.
  • European-style villas and government buildings.
  • Zoning policies that segregated French officials and Vietnamese locals.

Today, Hanoi still showcases its French colonial heritage, particularly in the Old Quarter, blending Vietnamese traditions with French-influenced urban design.

 

4. Nairobi, Kenya (British Empire)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~5.5 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~696 km²
πŸš‚ Founded as a railway depot (1899) for the Uganda Railway

The British founded Nairobi in 1899 as a railway hub for the Uganda Railway, but it quickly evolved into British East Africa’s colonial capital. The city was designed with rigid racial segregation, ensuring that Europeans occupied the best areas, while Africans and South Asians were pushed into underdeveloped districts.

Even today, inequalities in Nairobi’s urban landscape trace back to its colonial foundations. The city remains a major financial and diplomatic hub, but issues like poor infrastructure, wealth disparity, and informal settlements are remnants of British planning policies.

 

5. Manila, Philippines (Spanish & American Colonialism)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~14 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~636 km²
πŸ’° American redevelopment cost (1905–1915): $8 million (Equivalent to ~$250 million today)

Manila was initially shaped by the Spanish (1571–1898), with its Intramuros district built as a walled city to protect against invasions. After the U.S. took control in 1898, American planners, including Daniel Burnham, redesigned Manila with:

  • A grand waterfront boulevard (Roxas Boulevard).
  • Modernized road networks inspired by Washington D.C.
  • Public parks and new zoning laws.

Today, Manila is a complex mix of Spanish, American, and modern influences, reflecting its long colonial history.

 

6. BrasΓ­lia, Brazil (Portuguese Colonial Influence & Modernist Planning)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~3 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~5,802 km²
πŸ— Built in 41 months (1956–1960), costing $10 billion today)

While not a direct colonial city, BrasΓ­lia reflects Portuguese colonial urban planning concepts—centralized power, controlled expansion, and grand symbolic architecture. Designed by LΓΊcio Costa and Oscar Niemeyer, BrasΓ­lia was built entirely from scratch in just four years, replacing Rio de Janeiro as Brazil’s capital.

However, its strict zoning policies led to inequality, with elite government officials living in prime areas while the majority commuted from distant satellite towns.

 

Conclusion: The Lasting Impact of Colonial Urban Planning

Colonial cities were not just places of governance—they were built as instruments of control, designed for economic extraction, racial segregation, and political dominance. Many of these cities have since evolved, but their colonial-era foundations still shape modern urban challenges:

  • New Delhi’s grand avenues still serve as India’s political core.
  • Jakarta’s canals remain a flood-prone legacy of Dutch planning.
  • Nairobi’s zoning policies continue to affect housing inequality.
  • Manila’s American-built roads define its urban layout even today.

The legacy of colonial planning is still deeply embedded in these cities, often contributing to modern issues like traffic congestion, social inequality, and outdated infrastructure. While many have modernized, the shadows of colonialism still linger.


Read more about urban history: 

The transformation of Chinese cities (2000-2025): The rise of China’s megacities

Thursday, May 8, 2025

The WORST urban planning catastrophes of Southeast Asia

 

Urban planning is the art and science of designing cities to be livable, efficient, and sustainable. It involves everything from transportation systems to zoning laws, green spaces, and housing developments. When done well, it creates harmony between people and their environment. But when it fails? It can plunge cities into chaos, creating problems that linger for decades.

Southeast Asia, home to some of the most vibrant and rapidly growing cities in the world, has seen its fair share of urban planning disasters. Today, we’re peeling back the layers on the most infamous examples: traffic-clogged streets, crumbling infrastructure, and policies that failed to keep pace with urban growth. Get ready for a jaw-dropping journey through the region’s urban planning nightmares.

 


Growing Cities, Growing Problems
Southeast Asia’s cities are booming, with urban populations growing by more than 70 million people over the last two decades. But rapid growth brings unique challenges. Many cities in this region face unplanned urban sprawl, fueled by high rural-to-urban migration and a lack of coherent planning strategies. This has led to haphazard infrastructure development, chaotic land use, and insufficient public services.

One of the biggest challenges is traffic congestion. Cities like Manila and Jakarta are infamous for their gridlock, where peak-hour traffic feels like a constant state of paralysis. Over-reliance on private vehicles and underinvestment in public transit are common culprits.

Another key issue is environmental vulnerability. Many of these cities are coastal and face rising sea levels, monsoonal floods, and poor waste management. Jakarta’s situation, for example, has become so dire that the government is relocating the capital.

Inequality is another challenge. Poorer neighborhoods often lack access to adequate transportation, clean water, and sanitation. This leaves millions trapped in poverty while wealthier areas thrive, creating stark contrasts within the same city.

 

Disaster Spotlights: Where It All Went Wrong

Let’s explore some of Southeast Asia’s worst urban planning disasters in detail:

Manila, Philippines
Manila’s traffic congestion is often ranked among the worst in the world. Commuters here lose an average of 257 hours a year stuck in traffic, according to the Asian Development Bank. The root cause lies in a history of car-centric urban planning, where investment in roads vastly outpaced investment in public transit.

The city’s public transportation system is also notoriously unreliable. The Metro Rail Transit (MRT), a key commuter rail line, is plagued by overcrowding, frequent breakdowns, and insufficient capacity. Meanwhile, the jeepneys—once a cultural symbol—are aging and inefficient. Manila’s failure to integrate these systems has only worsened the chaos.

Jakarta, Indonesia
Jakarta’s sinking streets are both a symptom and a symbol of poor urban planning. 40% of the city is below sea level, and it sinks by about 25 cm per year in some areas. The primary culprit? Excessive groundwater extraction, as much of the city lacks piped water infrastructure. This has left Jakarta vulnerable to floods that regularly displace thousands and damage infrastructure.

Despite the introduction of the TransJakarta bus rapid transit system, traffic remains a major issue. With 13 million people commuting daily, the lack of an integrated, multi-modal transport network leaves most residents relying on private vehicles.

Bangkok, Thailand
Bangkok presents a mixed bag of planning successes and failures. The BTS Skytrain and MRT subway are efficient, but they only serve certain parts of the sprawling city. Most Bangkokians still rely on cars, motorcycles, and informal transport modes like tuk-tuks, contributing to gridlock. Pedestrian infrastructure is equally problematic, with narrow sidewalks that are often blocked by vendors or parked motorcycles.

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Rapid urbanization has transformed Ho Chi Minh City, but poor zoning has resulted in chaotic development. Flooding is a constant issue due to poorly designed drainage systems and widespread paving of natural floodplains. Despite the city’s attempts to modernize, its nascent metro system has faced significant delays and cost overruns.

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Kuala Lumpur’s urban sprawl has created vast, car-dependent suburbs, while the city center struggles with underused public spaces. The Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) system is a step forward, but first- and last-mile connectivity remains a challenge. Meanwhile, poorly maintained drainage systems contribute to frequent flash floods.

The Worst Case: Jakarta’s Sinking Crisis

If there’s one disaster that truly captures the consequences of poor urban planning, it’s Jakarta’s sinking neighborhoods. Imagine waking up to find your street submerged in knee-deep water—not once a year, but multiple times every rainy season. Residents of Pluit, one of Jakarta’s hardest-hit districts, have been forced to build makeshift walls around their homes to hold back floodwaters.

This disaster isn’t just a local issue—it’s a national crisis. The environmental toll includes the destruction of mangrove forests, which once protected Jakarta’s coastline. The economic cost is staggering, with annual flood damages running into billions of dollars. And the social cost? Entire communities are being uprooted, with no clear solution in sight.

Jakarta’s story serves as a cautionary tale for other cities in the region. Without sustainable urban planning, the combination of rapid growth, environmental challenges, and aging infrastructure can create disasters that are almost impossible to reverse.

Lessons from Failure
Urban planning disasters are more than just stories of failure—they’re lessons in what happens when we prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability. From Manila’s traffic nightmares to Jakarta’s sinking streets, Southeast Asia’s cities have shown us the cost of ignoring integrated, forward-thinking planning.

But all is not lost. Cities like Singapore and Hanoi are proving that with the right investments and policies, it’s possible to turn things around. Sustainable transport, better zoning laws, and climate-resilient infrastructure can help create urban spaces that work for everyone.


More about Southeast Asia:

The Production of Urban Space in Vietnam’s Metropolis in the course of Transition: Internationalization, Polarization and Newly Emerging Lifestyles in Vietnamese Society

Thursday, December 30, 2010

The Production of Urban Space in Vietnam’s Metropolis in the course of Transition: Internationalization, Polarization and Newly Emerging Lifestyles in Vietnamese Society

by Michael Waibel

Vietnam’s transitional development since the introduction of market-economy reforms in the late 1980s can certainly be described as a success story. The adoption of export-orientated growth and integration into economic globalization has opened the way for a modern consumer society. In accordance with most regional transition theories, the metropoles of Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi have derived the most benefit from the successive opening-up of the economy to global capital. These urban agglomerations are Vietnam’s most outstanding motor of innovation, growth, and globalisation and represent main target regions for flows of foreign direct investment (FDI). Here, the urban population can enjoy the highest overall living standard. However, it is also here that the most extreme income disparities are to be found. Furthermore, the metropoles suffer from increasing migration pressure, environmental problems such as air pollution, and rising crime rates. Moreover, the transition of Vietnamese urban society has also led to increasing social differentiation in terms of income, education, family size, consumption patterns, etc. to produce hitherto unknown class divisions. In terms of urban spaces, the commodification of urban development through several land use reforms allowing land use rights to be traded led to a transfer of state resources to private hands and consequently to a marketization of housing and land. Similar as in China, the state gave up its unique control on urban space and allowed the new actors, such as trans-national corporations, household enterprises or individuals. As a result, Vietnam’s metropoles have been witnessing the production of new urban spatial forms and elements driven by multiple forces.
 
Overview: New Urban Spaces 

The production of globally orientated spaces in the inner city cores can be seen in the massive and continuing construction of office and hotel space mostly by trans-national corporations. This contributes to the fast-track development of an internationalized Central Business District (CBD) (see Photo 1). In the urban periphery, export processing and industrial zones have been established to channel foreign direct investments, which initially also served as demarcated laboratory spaces for market economy conditions. In this context, the most important actors are companies from Japan and from the tiger economies of Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan, which in some cases have even taken over the operation of these zones. In Ho Chi Minh City alone, there are three export processing zones and ten industrial zones that have a total size of 2,354 ha and have attracted a cumulative of US$1.54 billion in FDI capital.


New residential quarters in Hanoi, Vietnam, image by E8Club

New residential quarters in Hanoi, Vietnam, image by E8Club
Kham Thien St. in Hanoi, Vietnam, image by adam79

more posts on urbanism of Vietnam:

A STUDY ON URBAN PLANNING /URBAN TRANSPORTATION ISSUES IN SOUTHEAST ASIAN COUNTRIES AND JAPAN’S TECHNICAL CORPORATIONINS

Master Planning Challenges for Ho Chi Minh City

TRANSFORMATION OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF HO CHI MINH CITY UNDER THE DOI-MOI POLICY AND THE ACCOMPANYING GLOBALIZATION PROCESS

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

A STUDY ON URBAN PLANNING /URBAN TRANSPORTATION ISSUES IN SOUTHEAST ASIAN COUNTRIES AND JAPAN’S TECHNICAL CORPORATIONINS

Tatsumi TOKUNAGA
Yoji TAKAHASHI

Abstract: 

In recent years, with the rapid economic growth and concentration of the population into urban areas, some unregulated developments have been conducted in urban areas in Southeast Asian countries, so that their governments are under the pressure of necessity to develop an adequate operation of urban planning systems. Not all of the Southeast Asian countries, however, always have appropriate technologies for the urban planning project. Therefore, in this context, Japan, with practical experience in urban planning, is expected to transfer its technology and know-how to such a planning. This paper analyzed the backgrounds and urban planning/urban transportation issues in the Southeast Asian countries and proposed a technical cooperation model in response to requests arising from those countries.

1. BACKGROUNDS AND OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

In Southeast Asian countries, urban areas have been developed unsystematically in recent years with their rapid economic growth and expansion of urban population, creating seriously aggravated living environments. Figure.1 shows a trend of urbanization process of industrialized countries and that of Southeast Asian countries. A negative impact of motorization, industrialization and economic growth in Southeast Asian countries accelerate urban service deterioration and accordingly generate serious urban issues, such as traffic congestion, Photo 1. Bangkok, the capital city of Thailand traffic accident, air/water pollution, and sprawl phenomenon in the central district of the city. These countries lack a well-established urban planning system and necessary technology and proper experience. To alleviate those of severe condition and improve their environment, Japan has dispatched technical experts (hereinafter referred to as “JICA experts”) to developing countries from the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), of which sole Japanese governmental agency in charge of bilateral technical cooperation and grant aid projects, in the view of a part of international cooperation, widely known as definition of Official Development Assistance (ODA).
JICA conducts an extensive technical cooperation program covering such subjects as the institution of various legal systems, establishment of technical standards, human resources development through technology transfer, and planning of individual projects.


Thailand, image by Gary Wong Photography
Jakarta, image by Aktiv Phil

Manila, image by Andy*Enero

Related posts about urban planning in southeast Asia:

Master Planning Challenges for Ho Chi Minh City

Great distance between Bangkok and Thailand's second largest city, Nonthaburi

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, URBANIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES IN HO CHI MINH CITY, VIETNAM: RELATIONS AND POLICIES

Monday, December 27, 2010

Master Planning Challenges for Ho Chi Minh City

Alan Fujimori

Abstract:
The potential for tourism should provide major socio-economic opportunities in the master planning of Ho Chi Minh City. Rapid urbanization requires that infrastructure especially transit keep ahead of development to focus private investment. Convenient access between home, work and supporting services will help the development of a strong and productive work force. The built environment and open space system must make the city livable by preserving its history, culture, and natural features that reveal the image and identity of Ho Chi Minh City.
Socio-Economic:
Tourism is the largest industry in the world and clearly of significance to developing countries. Substantial investments are required to capitalize major destination resorts, but the industry is now diversified enough to include wider participation by small and medium businesses. Tourism generates 11 percent of global GDP, employs 200 million people, transports 700 million international travelers per year, and is expected to double by 2020. However, developing countries have only 30 percent market share, a minority position.
The challenge for Ho Chi Minh City will be how to integrate appropriate types of tourism into master planning for the city to become a world-class destination that reflects its people, history, culture, and landscapes while protecting and conserving these resources.
Tourism is highly dependent on the natural and cultural assets of a place. In Hawaii, visitors are attracted by natural features such as our climate and pristine waters, as well as by our multicultural history. Vietnam has it own set of resources that can provide significant tourism opportunities. Today, authenticity has become an increasingly important attribute sought by the visitor in the international market.


Ho Chi Minh City, image by Espen Faugstad
more posts on urban planning of Ho Chi Minh City (Saigon):

The Contemporary Urban Problems in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Skyline photos of Ho Chi Minh City (Saigon) 1

TRANSFORMATION OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF HO CHI MINH CITY UNDER THE DOI-MOI POLICY AND THE ACCOMPANYING GLOBALIZATION PROCESS

Sunday, December 26, 2010

TRANSFORMATION OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF HO CHI MINH CITY UNDER THE DOI-MOI POLICY AND THE ACCOMPANYING GLOBALIZATION PROCESS

By DU Phuoc Tan and Shigeru FUKUSHIMA


Daily life in Ho Chi Minh City, image by Ronald HN Tan
Abstract:

Vietnam, and in particular Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), have experienced rapid socio-economic change echoing the global economy since 1986, when the central government started to implement the Doi-Moi policy, an overall economic reform. This study aims to clarify (1) how the socio-economic structure of HCMC has been changing under the Doi-Moi policy and the globalization process of Vietnam, and (2) what the mechanism of these changes is, including the relevant government policies. We can see the positive results of industrialization in terms of economic growth, modernization and formalization of industries. The favorable economic cycle of increasing foreign direct investment (FDI) and trade, Gross Regional Product (GRP) growth, emergence of private sectors, formalization of the economy and expansion of the local population and market has been formed gradually as part of the economic development of HCMC. These changes are due to a reciprocal impact process between the macro legal framework reform conducted by the central government and the development policies mapped out by the HCMC local government. Under the globalization process together with the local industrialization, there have obviously been transformations of HCMC society. The transformation of society has been revealed in the form of (1) formalization of society, (2) improvement in income and consumption and expansion of disparity, and (3) urbanization with massive migration.


read more posts on Vietnamiese urban planning:

Skyline photos of Ho Chi Minh City (Saigon) 1

The Contemporary Urban Problems in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, URBANIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES IN HO CHI MINH CITY, VIETNAM: RELATIONS AND POLICIES

Ho Chi Minh City, image by alex-s

Friday, December 24, 2010

The Ancient Quarter of Hanoi – A Reflection of Urban Transition Processes

Michael Waibel
ASIEN, (Juli 2004) 92, S. 30-48

Abstract:
This paper describes the effects of the Doi Moi policy, the latest stage in a series of historical transitions, on the urban landscape of Vietnam's oldest existing trade, market, and retail estate, the Ancient Quarter of Hanoi or 36 Streets Quarter. Economic liberalisation and the opening up to global capital have caused an enormous economic revitalization of this traditional quarter; however, 'beneficiaries of transition' have initiated a dramatic building and renovation boom. Although local, national and international agencies have formulated many plans to preserve the historic ambiance of the Quarter, many of the traditional tube-shape houses have been destroyed. The main reason for this development is to be found in delays typical of transition periods, as state institutions move beyond he centrally organized economy and adapt to a pluralistic market economy, as well as insufficient resources and the failure to enforce architectural guidelines. In general, the recent development of Hanoi shows similarities to many Eastern European cities, where distinct actor groups have initiated processes typical of transition, such as the rapid emergence of private enterprises, suburbanization processes, social as well as spatial polarization, the fast-track development of a Central Business District and catching up with internationalization and modernization processes.

image by E8Club

related posts about the urbanism of Vietnam: 

Skyline photos of Ho Chi Minh City (Saigon) 1

The Contemporary Urban Problems in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, URBANIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES IN HO CHI MINH CITY, VIETNAM: RELATIONS AND POLICIE