Like Urban Research on Facebook

Showing posts with label Leon Krier. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leon Krier. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Leon Krier's lesson in architecture

By Mathieu Helie

The Amazon Santa visited me this year and left Léon Krier’s latest, and likely ultimate, publication, The Architecture of Community. (Thanks to those who made generous purchases on the Emergent Urbanism Amazon Store, remember that you can also purchase anything at all.)
Back in the 1970′s when architectural modernism began to fall apart or be outright demolished, the architectural intelligentsia decided that it was okay to start using ornament again, to make buildings flashy, to take the dry structures of modern buildings and decorate them with absurd icons whose purpose was to entertain long enough that no one would notice that the architecture was still terrible. Léon Krier, a renegade amongst renegades who had no formal architectural education, had an other idea in mind: that there was such a thing as objective laws in architecture, that these laws remained unchanged over time, and that classicism was the best expression of these laws. Any other architect’s career would be destroyed by such a claim in such an era – Léon Krier just kept going, publishing article after article, book after book, until the estate of the Prince of Wales gave him his big break and commissioned the design of an entire neighborhood based upon his ideas. If there is a neo-traditionalist movement in architecture and urban design today, it is because Léon Krier imagined it first. This book is the compilation of the product of his career as an architect, but mostly as a writer.
Having read through the book, my conclusion is that Krier gives a thorough lesson in architecture, taking obvious pleasure is shredding the myths of modernism to pieces and exposing its false prophecies. However, the text never goes beyond the most superficially descriptive, often involving comparisons and an appeal to common sense.

Léon Krier:

Léon Krier discusses The Architecture of Community

What Andres Duany and Peter Calthrope Beieved in 1995

 


Saturday, February 26, 2011

Léon Krier discusses The Architecture of Community

By Scott Carlson


It's helpful to understand that Léon Krier is an architectural traditionalist before starting his book, The Architecture of Community (Island Press), or you might not get what his fuss is about. He begins with a rather provocative thought experiment: "If, one day, for some mysterious reason, all the buildings, settlements, suburbs, and structures built after 1945--especially those commonly called 'modern'--vanished from the face of the earth, would we mourn their loss?"
Well, yes, it seems we would. Just think of the great buildings by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Louis Kahn, Frank Lloyd Wright, and so on. But Krier's thought experiment doesn't end there: What if, instead, all of the pre-modern buildings--the ones we consider historic--disappeared? Would we weep more for them?
And there begins the rather provocative arguments that Krier lays out in Community. Krier contends that modernism, whatever its virtues in small scale, has been nothing but a disaster in larger scales--a force that has managed to sterilize cities aesthetically, ruin years of expertise in building trades, and lead planners and developers to compose cities in unsustainable ways. Krier punctuates his arguments with his illustrations, which are sometimes more like architectural editorial cartoons, presenting modern architecture in grotesque exaggeration. (If you're more of a picture-book kind of person, you might pick up Drawing for Architecture [The MIT Press], Krier's recently released collection of these illustrations, sans essays.) 


Leon Krier, by Daquella manera

more about architecture:

How many qualified Chinese landscape architects are there? – and how many does China need?

City Beautiful movement

Architecture & Urban Planning in China: urbanization to create massive infrastructure investment

Monday, October 4, 2010

What Andres Duany and Peter Calthrope Beieved in 1995

It is hard to change the form and structure of the cities of the United States, so that they become more environment-friendly. A great percent of the structure of the American cities are built after the World War II and most Americans are supposed to live in such environments. It is not so hard so say that it is hard to live in the sprawled American neighborhoods without automobile. In this case, American neighborhoods are different from the European ones.
The following video shows some of the neo-traditional development leaders like Anders Duany, Peter Calthorpe, Leon Krier, Lykoudis, Robertson, Adam, and Porphyrius declare their ideas about changing the way of thinking about the urban environment and neighborhoods. The video is related to 1995.