Like Urban Research on Facebook

Showing posts with label Jakarta. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jakarta. Show all posts

Friday, January 16, 2026

6 capital cities completely designed and built by colonial empires

Some of the world’s largest cities were never meant to serve their native populations. Instead, they were designed by foreign rulers to control land, extract wealth, and reinforce imperial dominance. Over 100 major cities worldwide were planned and constructed by colonial powers, many of which remain economic and political hubs today. But how did these cities emerge? How were they planned? And how much of their colonial legacy still lingers? Today, we uncover the most significant cities built by colonial powers—and the lasting impact they have had on the modern world.

 


Methodology: Defining Colonial Cities and Their Criteria

Before diving into specific cities, let's define what we mean by a colonial city. Colonialism involved powerful nations exerting control over foreign lands, often through military conquest, economic exploitation, and political dominance. These colonial powers needed administrative and trade centers, so they designed new cities rather than relying on existing indigenous settlements.

For this video, we classify a colonial city using three criteria:

  • It was planned and built primarily by colonial authorities.
  • It served as an administrative, military, or trade hub for the empire.
  • It incorporated European-style urban planning, including grid layouts, segregated districts, and monumental government structures.

Now, let’s explore some of the most historically significant cities that fit this definition.

 

1. New Delhi, India (British Empire)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~32 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~1,484 km²
πŸ’° Cost of Construction (1911): £4 million (Equivalent to ~£500 million today)

In 1911, the British colonial government decided to move India’s capital from Calcutta to New Delhi, aiming to create a symbol of British power. Designed by Sir Edwin Lutyens and Herbert Baker, New Delhi was built with wide boulevards, European-style government buildings, and geometric road patterns. It was intended to be a monument to British authority, segregating colonial rulers from the native Indian population.

Post-independence, New Delhi remained India’s capital, and today it is one of the world’s largest metropolitan areas, with a booming economy and a blend of colonial and modernist architecture.

 

2. Jakarta, Indonesia (Dutch East Indies)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~11 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~661 km²
πŸš† Dutch-built canals: Over 110 km (many still in use today)

Originally named Batavia, Jakarta was founded in 1619 by the Dutch East India Company (VOC). The Dutch meticulously planned the city with Amsterdam-style canals, aiming to facilitate trade and military defense. However, these canals became disease-ridden, leading to devastating malaria outbreaks in the 18th and 19th centuries.

Post-independence, Jakarta grew into Indonesia’s economic powerhouse, but colonial infrastructure contributed to its severe flooding problems, as many canals were poorly maintained or repurposed for informal housing.

 

3. Hanoi, Vietnam (French Indochina)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~8 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~3,358 km²
πŸ› French-built districts: 4 major colonial zones

Under French rule (1887–1954), Hanoi was transformed into the administrative capital of French Indochina. The French introduced:

  • Boulevards mimicking Paris, such as the iconic TrΓ ng Tiền Street.
  • European-style villas and government buildings.
  • Zoning policies that segregated French officials and Vietnamese locals.

Today, Hanoi still showcases its French colonial heritage, particularly in the Old Quarter, blending Vietnamese traditions with French-influenced urban design.

 

4. Nairobi, Kenya (British Empire)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~5.5 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~696 km²
πŸš‚ Founded as a railway depot (1899) for the Uganda Railway

The British founded Nairobi in 1899 as a railway hub for the Uganda Railway, but it quickly evolved into British East Africa’s colonial capital. The city was designed with rigid racial segregation, ensuring that Europeans occupied the best areas, while Africans and South Asians were pushed into underdeveloped districts.

Even today, inequalities in Nairobi’s urban landscape trace back to its colonial foundations. The city remains a major financial and diplomatic hub, but issues like poor infrastructure, wealth disparity, and informal settlements are remnants of British planning policies.

 

5. Manila, Philippines (Spanish & American Colonialism)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~14 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~636 km²
πŸ’° American redevelopment cost (1905–1915): $8 million (Equivalent to ~$250 million today)

Manila was initially shaped by the Spanish (1571–1898), with its Intramuros district built as a walled city to protect against invasions. After the U.S. took control in 1898, American planners, including Daniel Burnham, redesigned Manila with:

  • A grand waterfront boulevard (Roxas Boulevard).
  • Modernized road networks inspired by Washington D.C.
  • Public parks and new zoning laws.

Today, Manila is a complex mix of Spanish, American, and modern influences, reflecting its long colonial history.

 

6. BrasΓ­lia, Brazil (Portuguese Colonial Influence & Modernist Planning)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~3 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~5,802 km²
πŸ— Built in 41 months (1956–1960), costing $10 billion today)

While not a direct colonial city, BrasΓ­lia reflects Portuguese colonial urban planning concepts—centralized power, controlled expansion, and grand symbolic architecture. Designed by LΓΊcio Costa and Oscar Niemeyer, BrasΓ­lia was built entirely from scratch in just four years, replacing Rio de Janeiro as Brazil’s capital.

However, its strict zoning policies led to inequality, with elite government officials living in prime areas while the majority commuted from distant satellite towns.

 

Conclusion: The Lasting Impact of Colonial Urban Planning

Colonial cities were not just places of governance—they were built as instruments of control, designed for economic extraction, racial segregation, and political dominance. Many of these cities have since evolved, but their colonial-era foundations still shape modern urban challenges:

  • New Delhi’s grand avenues still serve as India’s political core.
  • Jakarta’s canals remain a flood-prone legacy of Dutch planning.
  • Nairobi’s zoning policies continue to affect housing inequality.
  • Manila’s American-built roads define its urban layout even today.

The legacy of colonial planning is still deeply embedded in these cities, often contributing to modern issues like traffic congestion, social inequality, and outdated infrastructure. While many have modernized, the shadows of colonialism still linger.


Read more about urban history: 

The transformation of Chinese cities (2000-2025): The rise of China’s megacities

Thursday, May 8, 2025

The WORST urban planning catastrophes of Southeast Asia

 

Urban planning is the art and science of designing cities to be livable, efficient, and sustainable. It involves everything from transportation systems to zoning laws, green spaces, and housing developments. When done well, it creates harmony between people and their environment. But when it fails? It can plunge cities into chaos, creating problems that linger for decades.

Southeast Asia, home to some of the most vibrant and rapidly growing cities in the world, has seen its fair share of urban planning disasters. Today, we’re peeling back the layers on the most infamous examples: traffic-clogged streets, crumbling infrastructure, and policies that failed to keep pace with urban growth. Get ready for a jaw-dropping journey through the region’s urban planning nightmares.

 


Growing Cities, Growing Problems
Southeast Asia’s cities are booming, with urban populations growing by more than 70 million people over the last two decades. But rapid growth brings unique challenges. Many cities in this region face unplanned urban sprawl, fueled by high rural-to-urban migration and a lack of coherent planning strategies. This has led to haphazard infrastructure development, chaotic land use, and insufficient public services.

One of the biggest challenges is traffic congestion. Cities like Manila and Jakarta are infamous for their gridlock, where peak-hour traffic feels like a constant state of paralysis. Over-reliance on private vehicles and underinvestment in public transit are common culprits.

Another key issue is environmental vulnerability. Many of these cities are coastal and face rising sea levels, monsoonal floods, and poor waste management. Jakarta’s situation, for example, has become so dire that the government is relocating the capital.

Inequality is another challenge. Poorer neighborhoods often lack access to adequate transportation, clean water, and sanitation. This leaves millions trapped in poverty while wealthier areas thrive, creating stark contrasts within the same city.

 

Disaster Spotlights: Where It All Went Wrong

Let’s explore some of Southeast Asia’s worst urban planning disasters in detail:

Manila, Philippines
Manila’s traffic congestion is often ranked among the worst in the world. Commuters here lose an average of 257 hours a year stuck in traffic, according to the Asian Development Bank. The root cause lies in a history of car-centric urban planning, where investment in roads vastly outpaced investment in public transit.

The city’s public transportation system is also notoriously unreliable. The Metro Rail Transit (MRT), a key commuter rail line, is plagued by overcrowding, frequent breakdowns, and insufficient capacity. Meanwhile, the jeepneys—once a cultural symbol—are aging and inefficient. Manila’s failure to integrate these systems has only worsened the chaos.

Jakarta, Indonesia
Jakarta’s sinking streets are both a symptom and a symbol of poor urban planning. 40% of the city is below sea level, and it sinks by about 25 cm per year in some areas. The primary culprit? Excessive groundwater extraction, as much of the city lacks piped water infrastructure. This has left Jakarta vulnerable to floods that regularly displace thousands and damage infrastructure.

Despite the introduction of the TransJakarta bus rapid transit system, traffic remains a major issue. With 13 million people commuting daily, the lack of an integrated, multi-modal transport network leaves most residents relying on private vehicles.

Bangkok, Thailand
Bangkok presents a mixed bag of planning successes and failures. The BTS Skytrain and MRT subway are efficient, but they only serve certain parts of the sprawling city. Most Bangkokians still rely on cars, motorcycles, and informal transport modes like tuk-tuks, contributing to gridlock. Pedestrian infrastructure is equally problematic, with narrow sidewalks that are often blocked by vendors or parked motorcycles.

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Rapid urbanization has transformed Ho Chi Minh City, but poor zoning has resulted in chaotic development. Flooding is a constant issue due to poorly designed drainage systems and widespread paving of natural floodplains. Despite the city’s attempts to modernize, its nascent metro system has faced significant delays and cost overruns.

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Kuala Lumpur’s urban sprawl has created vast, car-dependent suburbs, while the city center struggles with underused public spaces. The Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) system is a step forward, but first- and last-mile connectivity remains a challenge. Meanwhile, poorly maintained drainage systems contribute to frequent flash floods.

The Worst Case: Jakarta’s Sinking Crisis

If there’s one disaster that truly captures the consequences of poor urban planning, it’s Jakarta’s sinking neighborhoods. Imagine waking up to find your street submerged in knee-deep water—not once a year, but multiple times every rainy season. Residents of Pluit, one of Jakarta’s hardest-hit districts, have been forced to build makeshift walls around their homes to hold back floodwaters.

This disaster isn’t just a local issue—it’s a national crisis. The environmental toll includes the destruction of mangrove forests, which once protected Jakarta’s coastline. The economic cost is staggering, with annual flood damages running into billions of dollars. And the social cost? Entire communities are being uprooted, with no clear solution in sight.

Jakarta’s story serves as a cautionary tale for other cities in the region. Without sustainable urban planning, the combination of rapid growth, environmental challenges, and aging infrastructure can create disasters that are almost impossible to reverse.

Lessons from Failure
Urban planning disasters are more than just stories of failure—they’re lessons in what happens when we prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability. From Manila’s traffic nightmares to Jakarta’s sinking streets, Southeast Asia’s cities have shown us the cost of ignoring integrated, forward-thinking planning.

But all is not lost. Cities like Singapore and Hanoi are proving that with the right investments and policies, it’s possible to turn things around. Sustainable transport, better zoning laws, and climate-resilient infrastructure can help create urban spaces that work for everyone.


More about Southeast Asia:

The Production of Urban Space in Vietnam’s Metropolis in the course of Transition: Internationalization, Polarization and Newly Emerging Lifestyles in Vietnamese Society

Friday, February 3, 2012

THEORIES AND MODELS OF THE PERI-URBAN INTERFACE: A CHANGING CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE

by GermΓ‘n Adell

This paper seeks to find out if these different models of regional development share assumptions, viewpoints or values. Which are the policy implications for each of them? Are they only descriptive models or they can be translated into policy recommendations? In fact while all models seem to share at least one broad assumption concerning the evenness and equilibrium of development through the territory, this assumption needs to be challenged in light of new paradigms such as increased mobility, space-time compression and the multi-spatial context of the everyday household life.
This literature review consists basically in a thorough desk-based research of available material linked to the subject. The more recent literature is examined, basically from the 1990s onwards, unless otherwise demanded by cross linked references and the development of the theoretical discussion. All major scientific journals concerning both urban and rural sectors have been systematically reviewed. The under-representation of a specific topic in the material was interpreted - apart from involuntary errors or omissions - as a lack of interest coming from an editorial bias. In this sense, the relative under-representation of urban related topics in the “rural” literature was noted, while the opposite is not the case.
In section 2 the peri-urban discussion is introduced, historically situating the various concepts that have been coined to deal with the fringes where “city and countryside meet” and reviewing the traditional assumptions concerning the peri-urban concept.
Section 3 examines different regional development paradigms where the rural - urban relationship has been central. They constitute the theoretical background against which new conceptual developments, presented in section 4, are differentiated.
Sections 5 reviews some relevant and recent case studies dealing with the changing nature of the rural - urban interaction. Section 5 concludes by presenting the most extreme theoretical positions that mark nowadays the conceptual landscape, using them as epistemological landmarks to reveal the diversity of a still changing field.


mroe about regional devlopment:

A missed opportunity, and the shortcomings of regional planning

Indicators for Urban and Regional Planning

Integration of landscape fragmentation analysis into regional planning: A statewide multi-scale case study from California, USA

Great distance between Bangkok and Thailand's second largest city, Nonthaburi

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

THE OLD TOWN JAKARTA: PERSPECTIVES ON REVITALIZATION, CONSERVATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Widjaja Martokusumo
Associate Professor
Architectural Design Research Division
School of Architecture, Planning and Policy Development, Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB)
Architectural Design Symposium (CU:ADS 2010)

Abstract

Globalization affects current urban development, in which discourse on transformation and continuity have been critical over time regarding urban heritage. This has a close relationship with the maintenance of the genius loci as historic urban quarter’s aesthetic attribute. Based upon conflicts between development and conservation, this paper argues that conservation requires new critical interpretations, and must be part of the modernization constructs. Thus, planning policy must recognize the existing fabrics and address ambivalences. The Old Town Jakarta reveals how historic urban quarters should address future needs, and respectively cultural diversities and socio-economic dynamics are basis for creating sustainable urban forms.


Daan Mogot, Jakarta, image by khlasul Amal

Jakarta, image by tbSMITH

More articles about urbanism and urban planning in south east Asia:

The Production of Urban Space in Vietnam’s Metropolis in the course of Transition: Internationalization, Polarization and Newly Emerging Lifestyles in Vietnamese Society

TRANSFORMATION OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF HO CHI MINH CITY UNDER THE DOI-MOI POLICY AND THE ACCOMPANYING GLOBALIZATION PROCESS

Great distance between Bangkok and Thailand's second largest city, Nonthaburi

Despite planning MRT, BRT and SRT lines, Bangkok still suffers from traffic congestion

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

A STUDY ON URBAN PLANNING /URBAN TRANSPORTATION ISSUES IN SOUTHEAST ASIAN COUNTRIES AND JAPAN’S TECHNICAL CORPORATIONINS

Tatsumi TOKUNAGA
Yoji TAKAHASHI

Abstract: 

In recent years, with the rapid economic growth and concentration of the population into urban areas, some unregulated developments have been conducted in urban areas in Southeast Asian countries, so that their governments are under the pressure of necessity to develop an adequate operation of urban planning systems. Not all of the Southeast Asian countries, however, always have appropriate technologies for the urban planning project. Therefore, in this context, Japan, with practical experience in urban planning, is expected to transfer its technology and know-how to such a planning. This paper analyzed the backgrounds and urban planning/urban transportation issues in the Southeast Asian countries and proposed a technical cooperation model in response to requests arising from those countries.

1. BACKGROUNDS AND OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

In Southeast Asian countries, urban areas have been developed unsystematically in recent years with their rapid economic growth and expansion of urban population, creating seriously aggravated living environments. Figure.1 shows a trend of urbanization process of industrialized countries and that of Southeast Asian countries. A negative impact of motorization, industrialization and economic growth in Southeast Asian countries accelerate urban service deterioration and accordingly generate serious urban issues, such as traffic congestion, Photo 1. Bangkok, the capital city of Thailand traffic accident, air/water pollution, and sprawl phenomenon in the central district of the city. These countries lack a well-established urban planning system and necessary technology and proper experience. To alleviate those of severe condition and improve their environment, Japan has dispatched technical experts (hereinafter referred to as “JICA experts”) to developing countries from the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), of which sole Japanese governmental agency in charge of bilateral technical cooperation and grant aid projects, in the view of a part of international cooperation, widely known as definition of Official Development Assistance (ODA).
JICA conducts an extensive technical cooperation program covering such subjects as the institution of various legal systems, establishment of technical standards, human resources development through technology transfer, and planning of individual projects.


Thailand, image by Gary Wong Photography
Jakarta, image by Aktiv Phil

Manila, image by Andy*Enero

Related posts about urban planning in southeast Asia:

Master Planning Challenges for Ho Chi Minh City

Great distance between Bangkok and Thailand's second largest city, Nonthaburi

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, URBANIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES IN HO CHI MINH CITY, VIETNAM: RELATIONS AND POLICIES