Highways — the veins of modern cities, moving millions of cars and trucks every day. But here’s the dirty secret: these highways didn’t just connect cities; they ruined them. Yes, the same roads that make your morning commute possible also tore apart thriving neighborhoods, displaced thousands of families, and left gaping wounds in the heart of cities.
Today, we’re diving into “How Highways Ruined Cities,” exploring how the U.S. interstate system and figures like Robert Moses reshaped — or rather, disfigured — the urban landscape. So buckle up, because this ride isn’t pretty.
The
U.S. Interstate Highway System: A Dream Turns Sour
Let’s start with the U.S. Interstate Highway System, a project hailed as
one of the greatest achievements in American infrastructure. It all began in
1956 with the Federal-Aid Highway Act, which launched the construction
of over 41,000 miles of highways across the United States. The goal? To
link every major city, boost the economy, and make driving more efficient.
Sounds
great, right? Well, here’s the catch: highways didn’t just pass through empty
fields. They were often built right through urban neighborhoods,
especially in low-income areas and communities of color. And nowhere was
this more destructive than in cities like Detroit.
Detroit
and the I-375 Freeway
Detroit was once the beating heart of the American automotive industry, but its
story took a sharp detour with the construction of highways like I-375.
Built in the 1960s, I-375 plowed through the heart of Black Bottom and Paradise
Valley — two thriving African American neighborhoods filled with
businesses, jazz clubs, and homes.
In its place? A concrete scar.
The
construction of I-375 displaced over 100,000 residents and destroyed
nearly 2,800 homes. Black Bottom, once a vibrant cultural hub, was
literally bulldozed to make way for a highway that ultimately contributed to
Detroit’s economic and social decline. The new highway severed the community
from the downtown area and made it harder for businesses to thrive.
But Detroit
wasn’t alone in this story of urban destruction.
Robert
Moses: The Man Who Shaped (and Dismantled) New York City
Now, we can’t talk about highways and their impact without mentioning Robert
Moses, the man behind many of New York City’s highways, bridges, and parks.
Moses was a visionary urban planner, but he had a notorious obsession with building
roads — no matter the cost.
Between the
1930s and 1960s, Moses constructed over 13 expressways across New York
City, including the Cross Bronx Expressway and Brooklyn-Queens
Expressway. His projects displaced more than 250,000 residents
across the city, forever altering its landscape.
The
Cross Bronx Expressway
Let’s zoom in on the Cross Bronx Expressway. When Moses proposed this
six-lane highway in the late 1940s, it cut through one of the most densely
populated and stable neighborhoods in the Bronx — East Tremont.
Fun fact
(but not so fun for residents): To make way for the highway, Moses bulldozed through 600 apartment
buildings, displacing around 60,000 people. The expressway severed
the Bronx, dividing it into northern and southern halves. Property values
plummeted, and entire communities were left devastated by noise pollution,
increased traffic, and worsening air quality.
Over the
decades, the Bronx saw a rise in crime and poverty, with some
blaming the Cross Bronx Expressway for accelerating the borough’s decline in
the 1970s. This once-thriving middle-class neighborhood was left in ruins, and
Moses’s grand vision of efficiency came at the expense of the people who lived
there.
Why
Highways Targeted Certain Communities
But why were these highways always cutting through minority and low-income
neighborhoods? Well, it wasn’t by accident. In fact, redlining and racist
housing policies played a huge role.
Redlining, a practice where banks and
insurance companies refused to offer loans or coverage in predominantly Black
neighborhoods, left these areas vulnerable. Since they were deemed
"undesirable," city planners saw them as the perfect location for
highways, thinking it was better to build there than through affluent,
politically powerful communities.
The result?
Urban decay, the collapse of vibrant neighborhoods, and the rise of suburban
sprawl, as wealthier, predominantly white residents fled to the suburbs,
leaving the city’s core to rot.
Highways were kind of like the original “ghosting” — except instead of
disappearing from a text conversation, people disappeared from entire
neighborhoods.
The
Suburban Dream and Urban Decline
Highways didn’t just destroy urban neighborhoods; they fueled the suburban
dream. In the post-war era, Americans were eager to leave the crowded,
noisy city for the spacious, picket-fenced suburbs. The new highway system made
this possible by enabling people to live farther from their jobs and still
commute relatively easily.
By the
1960s, over 60 million Americans had moved to the suburbs, encouraged by
government incentives like low-interest home loans and, of course, the
sprawling network of interstate highways. Cities, meanwhile, were left with
declining tax bases, abandoned buildings, and neighborhoods torn apart by the
very highways meant to connect them.
Fun
fact: Between 1950
and 1980, cities like St. Louis and Cleveland lost nearly half
their populations as residents fled to the suburbs. This hollowing-out of
cities contributed to the rise of urban blight — abandoned, decaying
buildings that stood in stark contrast to the shiny new suburban developments.
The
Environmental Costs of Highways
It’s not just communities that paid the price for highways; the environment
suffered too. Highways encourage car dependency, which means more
traffic, more fuel consumption, and more greenhouse gas emissions. In
fact, transportation is responsible for nearly 30% of all U.S. carbon
emissions, with highways playing a major role.
Moreover,
the construction of highways often led to the destruction of natural
habitats and green spaces. For example, when Interstate 5 was
built along the West Coast, it cut through wetlands, forests, and wildlife
habitats, leaving a trail of ecological damage in its wake.
Can
We Fix It? The Future of Highways
So, after all this damage, is there any hope for our cities? Well, some cities
are starting to recognize the havoc highways have wreaked and are working to
undo the damage.
Take San Francisco, for example. After the 1989 Loma Prieta
earthquake damaged the Embarcadero Freeway, the city decided not to
rebuild it. Instead, they replaced it with a beautiful waterfront boulevard and
public spaces, reconnecting the city with its bay. Property values shot up,
tourism increased, and the area became one of San Francisco’s most vibrant
neighborhoods.
Another
example is Rochester, New York, which removed a portion of its inner
loop highway in 2017. By filling in the road and replacing it with housing,
bike lanes, and pedestrian paths, the city was able to revitalize the downtown
area and promote sustainable urban living.
Conclusion:
Highways Shaped, and Sometimes Destroyed, Our Cities
Highways were built to bring us together, but they ended up tearing many
communities apart. From Detroit’s Black Bottom to New York’s East Tremont, the
legacy of highways is one of displacement, environmental damage, and urban
decay.
But it
doesn’t have to stay this way. Cities around the world are rethinking their
relationship with highways, focusing on public transit, walkability,
and reconnecting neighborhoods that were once divided.
The secret
to a healthy city isn’t more highways — it’s more human-centered design. After
all, cities are for people, not cars.
No comments:
Post a Comment