Like Urban Research on Facebook

Showing posts with label Globalization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Globalization. Show all posts

Friday, February 3, 2012

THEORIES AND MODELS OF THE PERI-URBAN INTERFACE: A CHANGING CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE

by Germán Adell

This paper seeks to find out if these different models of regional development share assumptions, viewpoints or values. Which are the policy implications for each of them? Are they only descriptive models or they can be translated into policy recommendations? In fact while all models seem to share at least one broad assumption concerning the evenness and equilibrium of development through the territory, this assumption needs to be challenged in light of new paradigms such as increased mobility, space-time compression and the multi-spatial context of the everyday household life.
This literature review consists basically in a thorough desk-based research of available material linked to the subject. The more recent literature is examined, basically from the 1990s onwards, unless otherwise demanded by cross linked references and the development of the theoretical discussion. All major scientific journals concerning both urban and rural sectors have been systematically reviewed. The under-representation of a specific topic in the material was interpreted - apart from involuntary errors or omissions - as a lack of interest coming from an editorial bias. In this sense, the relative under-representation of urban related topics in the “rural” literature was noted, while the opposite is not the case.
In section 2 the peri-urban discussion is introduced, historically situating the various concepts that have been coined to deal with the fringes where “city and countryside meet” and reviewing the traditional assumptions concerning the peri-urban concept.
Section 3 examines different regional development paradigms where the rural - urban relationship has been central. They constitute the theoretical background against which new conceptual developments, presented in section 4, are differentiated.
Sections 5 reviews some relevant and recent case studies dealing with the changing nature of the rural - urban interaction. Section 5 concludes by presenting the most extreme theoretical positions that mark nowadays the conceptual landscape, using them as epistemological landmarks to reveal the diversity of a still changing field.


mroe about regional devlopment:

A missed opportunity, and the shortcomings of regional planning

Indicators for Urban and Regional Planning

Integration of landscape fragmentation analysis into regional planning: A statewide multi-scale case study from California, USA

Great distance between Bangkok and Thailand's second largest city, Nonthaburi

Friday, December 2, 2011

DRIVING SOUTH: THE GLOBALIZATION OF AUTO CONSUMPTION AND ITS SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF SPACE

by Peter Freund and George Martin

Since its birth over a century ago, the automobile has become an icon of freedom, progress and modernity throughout most of the world. Automobile ownership is used as an indicator of economic development. The car is the leading mass produced durable good in the world. In mature developed countries, it has become the dominant transport modality--indeed, in parts of the United States the only viable means of everyday mobility. Most significantly, the successful realization of individualized automobile consumption for the great majority of populations in places like the US has structured general perceptions of what is the most desirable and the most practical use of technology (Freund and Martin 1996:3).
Countries of the South are rapidly adopting Western modes of consumption such as mass automobile ownership and use. This trend raises issues of what constitutes material prosperity, the good life, and, concomitantly, what development is. But what, then, should we mean by development? And how do we measure higher living standards? Are the living standards of a family in Bangkok raised, for example, when their cash income rises enough so that they can purchase an automobile- -when the pleasure of car ownership is offset by the loss of free time caused by the need to work more hours, or even take a second job, to pay for the car and all its attendant costs, by the longer commuting time caused by other motorists exercising their freedom, by lung cancer, by the generalized urban blight of jammed roads, car parks, petrol stations, used-car lots, drive-in fast-food franchises, brown skies and howling car alarms? Is this a higher standard of living? Evidently not just bourgeois economists but even market-socialists and many Marxists think so, for few bother to question the nature of development per se (Smith 1997:28).
It is this replication of auto-centered transport, etched in concrete and asphalt, that is the embodiment of a transport dream to which many in the world aspire. However, the car represents more than transport--the mass consumption of automobiles has transformed the physical structure of landscapes, contributed to atmospheric degradation, and led to changes in the social organization of communities.


similar posts:

The Missing Organizational Dimension in Urban Sociology

BENEFITING FROM GLOBALISATION: TRANSPORT SECTOR CONTRIBUTION AND POLICY CHALLENGES

Globalization and research issues in transportation

INTEGRATING PLACE IDENTITY, URBAN SUSTAINABILITY AND GLOBALIZATION: A GREAT CHALLENGE FOR THE CITY OF THE FUTURE

BENEFITING FROM GLOBALISATION: TRANSPORT SECTOR CONTRIBUTION AND POLICY CHALLENGES

Introductory Reports and Summary of Discussions, 25-27 October 2006, BERLIN

A set of reports and papers in 470 pages.
Here you read the introduction to the first paper:

This paper provides an overview of recent trends in international trade and transportation. The goal is two-fold. First, changes in international trade and integration are documented, that have particularly interesting consequences for transportation demand. Second, we see how international transportation demand itself has changed, and provide a forward look to likely future changes. The basic insights of the paper are these. International trade has grown rapidly, driven primarily by growth in manufactures, and growth in the “extensive” and “quality” margins of trade. The composition of trade has changed in important ways that affect transportation demand. Goods are lighter, and manufacturing exports embody a growing share of foreign inputs. But for all the talk about a new era of globalisation, trade frictions remain significant: most firms serve only domestic markets; borders still matter; distance maintains a surprisingly strong grip on trade; and trade spells are very short, especially for “new” and small-valued flows.
While ocean cargo continues to dominate tonnages shipped, airborne cargo is growing rapidly and, despite its much greater cost, represents a remarkably large and growing share of trade by value. Why has air transport grown so rapidly? Four factors seem especially important. Timely delivery has become more valuable, the absolute and relative cost of air shipping has declined precipitously, oods are getting lighter, and consumer incomes are rising, especially at the upper end of the income distribution. Looking forward, airplanes will become only more useful because of their particular value in accomplishing four goals: coordinating far-flung production processes; reaching distant markets and the interior regions of geographically large countries; hedging uncertain demand and testing “new markets”.


more about globalization:

Boredom in a Globalized World

URBAN SOCIOLOGY IN THE 21ST CENTURY

Cities on the Prowl

Cross-national Lesson Drawing for Planning – Taking Advantage of Globalization

Globalization and research issues in transportation

by Donald G. Janelle and Michel Beuthe

This paper concentrates on the dualistic role of transportation as a pro-active agent of globalization and as a beneficiary of its development. Surprisingly, transportation is possibly the least researched element in the complex of factors that foster a changing world economy. The goal is to suggest areas that require an informed social science perspective based on research that will enhance theoretical understandings and policy formulations. Beginning with a focus on changes in the nature of demand for transportation and its supply, the discussion considers issues relating to regional inequalities in accessibility, standardization for multimodal transport, and governance of global transportation. The vulnerability of transport-dependent globalization, and the role of transportation in the dematerialization of society for sustainable development are also areas suggested for extended research.


more about globalization:

Governance of Tehran City - Region: Challenges and Trends

Globalization, building technology and architecture

Globalisation, Cleaner Energy and Mega-Cities: Options and Messages for Turkey/Istanbul

CHINA’S CITIES, GLOBALIZATION, AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: COMPARATIVE THOUGHTS ON URBAN PLANNING, ENERGY, AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY

Friday, April 15, 2011

Governance of Tehran City - Region: Challenges and Trends

by Dr. Abbas Ahmad Akhoundi, Dr. Naser Barakpou, Iradj Asadie, Habibollah Taherkhani, Maysam Basirat, Golzar Zandi

The main focus of present paper is study and analysis of the crucial challenges of Tehran Metropolitan Region arrangements for governance (political and functional fragmentation) and also attempts that have carried out for coping with those challenges and realizing some integration and regionalism in spatial planning and management of Tehran Metropolitan Region (TMR), the attempts that for lack of supportive sources such as legislative, financial and political tools have not faced with great success.


Tehran, by Sam Anvari
more posts about Tehran:

Urban Planning for Tehran, By Using Environmental Modeling and GIS/RS

Tehran Urban Development Planning with a Landscape Ecology Approach (Case Study: Municipal District 22, Tehran)

Low Carbon Housing for `Young Cities`: Experiences from Hashtgerd New Town, Iran

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Globalization, building technology and architecture

by Shashi Bhooshan

Are we losing control over our architecture, technology and sense of identity? Or are we developing ourselves to be masters of a postmodern global culture? Are we slowly succumbing to the pressures of an economic and cultural globalization or are we developing skills to inflect the global juggernaut to our ends?
This essay is an attempt to evaluate the current scenario of trends and changes taking place in architecture and construction industry and technology in India largely as a result of the on-going globalization of its economy. The hypothesis here is that technological changes are never neutral and is prompted not so much by economic compulsions alone, but more by external influences and cultural incursions of a global phenomenon. This I believe is first manifested in developing taste cultures and style in the name of superiority of a mythical ‘world class’ and creation of a sign system and myth supposed to be denoting world class and progress. It will be argued that by its very nature, the process, at least in the short run – I think, a fairly long short run even if that be so, will heighten the dichotomies with in the industry and social consumption of architecture as the cost of construction will be rising without commensurate increase in the affordability of large proportion of people. As a cultural phenomenon, if this will create a postmodern society, a la USA, or will it create social tensions in India is something which requires investigation and debate. For the purposes of this paper, we will restrict the arguments only to the building industry.


Globalization and architecture, photo by ultraBobban
more about globalization:

Globalisation, Cleaner Energy and Mega-Cities: Options and Messages for Turkey/Istanbul

The Missing Organizational Dimension in Urban Sociology

Boredom in a Globalized World

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Globalisation, Cleaner Energy and Mega-Cities: Options and Messages for Turkey/Istanbul

by Mehmet Öğütçü

Tectonic changes are occurring not only in the world financial system, trading and investment, energy, geopolitics, and technology; a fundamental transformation is also underway in the way the cities have been managed and regenerated, creating profound implications for mega-cities such as Istanbul. The global population is congregating in our cities. Eighty per cent of the world’s estimated nine billion people in 2050 are expected to live in urban areas. Our cities and urban areas face many challenges from social to health to environmental. The impacts of cities and urban areas are felt in other regions which supply cities with food, water and energy and absorb pollution and waste. However, the proximity of people, businesses and services associated with the very word ‘city’ means that there are also huge opportunities. Indeed, well designed, well managed urban settings offer a key opportunity for sustainable living.


Istanbul, Turkey, by obinho27
more articles about Istanbul:

Modeling street connectivity, pedestrian movement and land-use according to standard GIS street network representations: A Comparative Study

THE EFFECTS OF PROPOSED BRIDGES ON URBAN MACROFORM OF ISTANBUL: a syntactic evaluation

APPLICATION OF THE URBAN REALMS MODEL TO ISTANBUL

INTEGRATING PLACE IDENTITY, URBAN SUSTAINABILITY AND GLOBALIZATION: A GREAT CHALLENGE FOR THE CITY OF THE FUTURE

by M.Sepe

Cities  are  now  increasingly  encouraged  to  specialize  and  compete  with  one another  to be more attractive  to visitors and  tourists. While competition means the recovery of degraded historic centres, revitalization of former industrial sites or enhancement of areas for cultural use, it often leads to the standardisation of cities and the consequent loss of place identity and decline in quality of life for its inhabitants.
Starting from this premise this paper proposes PlaceMaker, a qualitative method of  urban  analysis  and  design,  for  drawing  up  urban  projects  focusing  on  the conservation and enhancement of place identity as well as able to face up to the challenge  of  globalization.  The  method’s  potential  for  areas  with  a  predominantly  pedestrian  vocation  is  illustrated by means  of  a  case  study,  the  Ramblas in Barcelona, where globalization is creating great changes.


Rambla de Canaletes, Barcelona, photo by Almusaiti
Rambla de Canaletes, Barcelona, photo by Ramiro Sánchez-Crespo
more posts about urban revitalization:

MEXICO: Capital Badly in Need of Urban Regeneration

Creating Wealth: Revitalization and Gentrification

Urban Revitalization: Best Practices to Prevent Residential Displacement Due to Gentrification

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

City-Regions, Neoliberal Globalization and Democracy: A Research Agenda

by MARK PURCELL

This paper argues that research on city-regions could benefit from more sustained and critical attention to the question of democracy. That is, it should examine more closely how decisions in city-regions are made, why they are made that way, and how they can be made more democratically. Much current research on politics in cities has framed the issue in terms of citizenship. That work has produced great insight. However, the attention to citizenship has prompted very little attention to democracy, even though the two concepts are deeply intertwined. Current interest in city-regions opens up the possibility that a vibrant line of research on democracy can be added to and engage with that on citizenship.


more about globalization:

Boredom in a Globalized World

CHINA’S CITIES, GLOBALIZATION, AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: COMPARATIVE THOUGHTS ON URBAN PLANNING, ENERGY, AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY

URBAN SOCIOLOGY IN THE 21ST CENTURY

Why Has Globalization Led to Bigger Cities?


One might have thought that striking declines in the costs of shipping goods and communicating knowledge across space would have led to a great dispersal of population. After all, it is at least technically possible to telecommute over great distances. Yet the share of the world living in urbanized areas increased from 40.9 percent in 1985 to more than 50 percent today.
In the developing world, urbanization has often taken the form of exploding populations in megacities.  Mumbai’s population increased to 19 million in 2007 from 10.8 million in 1985.  Bangalore, the urban symbol of the flat world, has had its population double over two decades, to 6.8 million today from 3.4 million in 1985.
The growth of these cities and the continuing strength of older urban areas — like New York, London and Paris — is no accident. Globalization and new technologies attract people to big cities, by increasing the returns to urban proximity. While it would be technically possible to sit and write software somewhere in the  Vale of Kashmir (at least if you didn’t mind the bullets), the innovators in Indian information technology cluster around one another in Bangalore. America’s computer wizards likewise choose to cluster in Silicon Valley rather than disperse.


more posts about globalization:

Creative Copenhagen: Globalization, Urban Governance and Social Change

Cross-national Lesson Drawing for Planning – Taking Advantage of Globalization

The Missing Organizational Dimension in Urban Sociology

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Creative Copenhagen: Globalization, Urban Governance and Social Change

ANDERS LUND HANSEN, HANS THOR ANDERSEN and ERIC CLARK

The introduction of ‘creativity’ and the ‘creative city’ in imagineering Copenhagen and in strategies for developing its urban competitiveness is analysed from a perspective on relations between processes of globalization, developments in urban government/governance and social geographic change. This perspective problematizes what on the surface seems to be an unequivocally positive quality (‘creative’) and goal (‘creativity’). We argue there is a need to recognize the social costs of developments that are glossed over by the creative city rhetoric, including diminished representative democracy, social and geographic polarization and considerable displacement of the marginalized.


Brands in Copenhagen, photo by {Guerrilla Futures | Jason Tester}
More brands in Copenhagen, photo by Tartanna
Some readings about Copenhagen:

Where’s Low Carbon Transport in Post-Copenhagen Pledges?

Do We Really All Have To Live Like New Yorkers? Does Density Matter?

Copenhagen – city of cyclists!

Cross-national Lesson Drawing for Planning – Taking Advantage of Globalization

Robin Hambleton

The forces of globalization have altered the context within which planners operate dramatically. Some believe that the consequences are grim – they point to growing economic and social divisions in societies, as well as environmental exploitation and the erosion of public safety as global terror finds its place in a ‘borderless world’. A more optimistic interpretation of current trends suggests that, fuelled by advances in communications technology, global awareness is growing rapidly in the population at large. Moreover, transnational migrants are refreshing the culture and politics of many countries with the result that an increasing number of cities are now experiencing the benefits of ‘dynamic diversity’ – that is, a very rapid expansion in the percentage of foreign-born residents. In this paper, by drawing on the arguments presented in a new book [Governing Cities in a Global Era by Robin Hambleton and Jill Simone Gross (forthcoming)], we explore four themes: 1) The nature of globalization, 2) Global urban trends, 3) Dynamic diversity in the modern city, and 4) The implications of these developments for cross-national policy transfer. It will be claimed that the ideas that guide city planning theory and practice are being reshaped by a global conversation about the strengths and weaknesses of alternative ways of responding to these new challenges. By referring to concrete examples of cross-national policy transfer the paper aims to point towards new directions for planning scholarship and practice in a multicultural world.


Global brands in Hong Kong, photo by geographyalltheway.com
more posts about globalization:

Cities on the Prowl

The Missing Organizational Dimension in Urban Sociology

URBAN SOCIOLOGY IN THE 21ST CENTURY

CHINA’S CITIES, GLOBALIZATION, AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: COMPARATIVE THOUGHTS ON URBAN PLANNING, ENERGY, AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY

EDWARD H. ZIEGLER

China is no longer a slumbering giant. Its appetite for resources and energy is enormous and growing. The largest construction boom in world history is currently underway in China, and the country’s need for resources to fuel that development is increasingly felt in world markets.
As China rapidly develops a modern industrial and technological economy, it joins the United States and other industrialized nations as amajor consumer of resources and energy, as well as a major polluter of local and global ecosystems. The magnitude of growth in China is such that the global impact of its transformation is now unfolding across all nations of the world.
China has become the second largest consumer of energy in the world behind the United States. It is already the world’s largest consumer of concrete, coal, and iron ore. In addition, China is the world’s second largest consumer of oil, and approximately half of the oil is imported. China’s demand for electricity is also growing rapidly. One report estimates that the demand will increase by 2600 gigawatts by 2050. This increase is equal to adding four 300 megawatt power plants every week for the next forty-five years, or adding more than 9000 300 megawatt power plants by the middle of this century. The vast majority of these power plants are likely to be powered by coal. Like the United States, nearly all of China’s energy is produced by fossil fuels. China is the world’s second largest source of greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels, after the United States. Those emissions are expected to grow to nearly equal the entire industrialized world’s increase in greenhouse gas emissions from 2000 to 2030.12 The events in China and the United States during the first half of this century may govern the issues of peak oil, global warming, and climate change for the world.
China’s growth continues to be transformative in scale. In nearly every way and from almost any perspective, China’s growth seems unprecedented and unending. China’s economic growth during the past twenty-five years, for example, is the largest and most sustained economic expansion in modern history. Economic expansion and relocation to China’s cities are radically altering China’s urban infrastructure and built environment, in addition to fueling China’s increase in demand for resources and energy.
Over 300 million Chinese peasants moved from the countryside to cities during the past twenty-five years. This constitutes the largest migration in world history. Moreover, growth in China is far from over. China’s urban areas will have to be developed to accommodate perhaps as many as 500 million more peasants (nearly twice the population of the United States) by mid-century. During the next fifteen years, China is expected to construct new buildings totaling more than thirty billion square meters in floor space. There is simply no historical precedent anywhere in the world for an urban transformation of this magnitude.


Shanghai, China, photo by troismarteaux

Songjiang University Metro Station, photo by beelaineo

more posts about China:

Monday, January 24, 2011

Boredom in a Globalized World

by

At the center of the city of Kashgar, on the far western edge of China, is a city of twisting streets lined by mud and brick buildings dating back centuries, to when Kashgar was a trading post along the Silk Road. The Chinese filled in a moat to create a ring road back in the 1980s, and built a highway through the middle of the historic center a few years later, but this historic urban core remained largely intact until recently. Today, Party officials in Beijing have issued a death sentence to historic Kashgar, citing earthquake-preparedness as an excuse for removing the largely Muslim population and leveling the neighborhood house by house as the residents leave.
I've never been to Kashgar; and yet, I find this news deeply disturbing. Reading a recent New York Times article about the Kashgar "redevelopment" on the heels of Katia's post about the planned clearance and "redevelopment" of Dharavi yesterday got me thinking about the effects that clearance projects have on the sociocultural fabric of our cities, and wondering what local changes might signal in the broader context of globalization.


Kashgar, China, photo by Lukas
more post about China:

Architecture & Urban Planning in China: urbanization to create massive infrastructure investment

A GIS-based gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern of Shanghai metropolitan area, China

The Empty City of Ordos, China: A Modern Ghost Town

Sunday, January 16, 2011

URBAN SOCIOLOGY IN THE 21ST CENTURY

SASKIA SASSEN

Identifying critical issues confronting an urban sociology of the twenty-first century entails a decision and a judgment, both in turn inevitably derived from an interpretation of history in the making. The enterprise is, thus, partial and positioned. Developing analytical and empirical elements (and I emphasize elements) for an urban sociology focused on the early twenty-first century does not override existing sociological tools nor the rich scholarship on cities. Indeed, the trends this chapter focuses on do not necessarily encompass the prevailing features of the urban condition today. Most of social life in cities probably still corresponds to older continuing and familiar trends. That is why much of urban sociology’s traditions and wellestablished subfields will remain important and continue to constitute the heart of this discipline. At the same time, if one were confined to traditional concepts of urban sociology, one would overlook or underestimate critical aspects of major new trends coming together in a growing number of cities. And while there are good reasons why most of urban sociology has not quite engaged these issues, notably the deficiencies of current data sets to address trends at the level of the city, we need to push forward. Already in the 1980s and 1990s, we have seen important contributions to this forward-looking task in the field of sociology (e.g., Friedmann and Wolff 1982; Sassen-Koob 1982; Gottdiener 1985; Rodriguez and Feagin 1986; Castells 1989; King 1990; Zukin 1991; Abu-Lughod 1994; Lash and Urry 1994; Smith 1995, to cite but a few) as well as in other disciplines. But current trends also signal the beginning of a whole new research and theorization agenda. Large cities around the world are today the terrain where some of the novel conditions marking the twenty-first century hit the ground: Multiple globalization processes assume concrete localized forms, electronic networks intersect with thick environments (whether financial centers or activist meetings), and new subjectivities arise from the encounters of people from all around the world. Thus, today’s large cities have emerged as a strategic site for a whole range of new types of operations, some pertaining to the global economy (e.g., Globalization and World Cities Study Group and Network [GaWC]; Fainstein and Judd 1999; Scott 2001; Abrahamson 2004; Gugler 2004; Rutherford 2004; Amen, Archer, and Bosman 2006; Harvey, forthcoming) and others to political, cultural, and subjective domains (e.g., Abu-Lughod 1994; Clark and Hoffman- Martinot 1998; Allen, Massey, and Pryke 1999; Watson and Bridges 1999; Glaeser 2000; Cordero-Guzman, Smith, and Grosfoguel 2001; Krause and Petro 2003; Lloyd 2005; Brenner and Keil 2006). Some of these trends are urban, but others are not and merely find in the city one of the sites for their enactment. Either way, it suggests that cities are a type of place where we can carry out detailed ethnographies, surveys, or other types of empirical studies about several of today’s major processes that are global at least in some of their dimensions. It is one of the nexuses where the new types of trends materialize and assume concrete forms that can be constituted as objects of study. The effort in this chapter is to discuss the scholarship that has sought to capture these trends in their urban shape. The chapter is thus not a comprehensive examination of the vast scholarship on urban sociology, mostly focused on more familiar conditions, but an attempt to detect novel trends becoming evident in cities as we enterthe twenty-first century. Following a brief introduction, the first half of this chapter examines a series of major economic dynamics that carry significant urban implications and hence call for the development of novel analytic elements. The second half follows the same logic but in this case focuses on a variety of transnational political and cultural processes.


more articles about urban sociology:

Cities on the Prowl

The Missing Organizational Dimension in Urban Sociology

The Missing Organizational Dimension in Urban Sociology

Michael McQuarrie
Nicole P. Marwell

Our article takes issue with the treatment of organizations in much urban sociology. We argue that both Marxian political economists and Chicagoan ethnographers and quantitative analysts treat organizations as derivative rather than productive of urban social relations. This problem is not epistemological or methodological. Instead, it is rooted in the objects of analysis that urban sociologists choose. Drawing on key elements of structuration theory, we attempt to lay the groundwork for improving the treatment of organizations in urban sociology by flagging some of the key insights in the sociology of organizations. We do not view this intellectual borrowing as a one-way street, and we emphasize that urbanists have a contribution to make to sociological thinking about organizations. Correcting these problems is essential if we are to understand the link between contemporary institutional transformations and urban neighborhoods.


related posts:

Radical Intellectuals: What Happened to the New Urban Sociology?

Cities on the Prowl

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Cities on the Prowl

The Urban Age Institute 
 
Cities in the modern world are beginning to share some features with the city-states of millennia past — communicating, trading, competing. But they're two differences: Today it's nation states, not city-states, that occasionally go to war. And unlike the walled cities that harbored flourishing trade in Medieval Europe, today there are literally thousands of cities on the rise, and looking outward in search not of silk and spices, but rather sources of finance, global talent, and most of all, good ideas. But the search for knowledge isn't always easy. And there can be resistance — for example the short-sightededness of journalistic watchdogs who see in mayoral travel only junkets, not fruit-bearing study of better and smarter practices elsewhere. But here's the big news that really counts. It's that the 500 largest cities on the planet are sending delegations to visit each other, repeatedly and consistently every year, on the order of thousands of study trips annually. The cities are selected carefully, so that visitors may acquire valuable knowledge to speed improvements back home.

more readings: