Like Urban Research on Facebook

Showing posts with label Philippines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philippines. Show all posts

Friday, January 16, 2026

6 capital cities completely designed and built by colonial empires

Some of the world’s largest cities were never meant to serve their native populations. Instead, they were designed by foreign rulers to control land, extract wealth, and reinforce imperial dominance. Over 100 major cities worldwide were planned and constructed by colonial powers, many of which remain economic and political hubs today. But how did these cities emerge? How were they planned? And how much of their colonial legacy still lingers? Today, we uncover the most significant cities built by colonial powers—and the lasting impact they have had on the modern world.

 


Methodology: Defining Colonial Cities and Their Criteria

Before diving into specific cities, let's define what we mean by a colonial city. Colonialism involved powerful nations exerting control over foreign lands, often through military conquest, economic exploitation, and political dominance. These colonial powers needed administrative and trade centers, so they designed new cities rather than relying on existing indigenous settlements.

For this video, we classify a colonial city using three criteria:

  • It was planned and built primarily by colonial authorities.
  • It served as an administrative, military, or trade hub for the empire.
  • It incorporated European-style urban planning, including grid layouts, segregated districts, and monumental government structures.

Now, let’s explore some of the most historically significant cities that fit this definition.

 

1. New Delhi, India (British Empire)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~32 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~1,484 km²
πŸ’° Cost of Construction (1911): £4 million (Equivalent to ~£500 million today)

In 1911, the British colonial government decided to move India’s capital from Calcutta to New Delhi, aiming to create a symbol of British power. Designed by Sir Edwin Lutyens and Herbert Baker, New Delhi was built with wide boulevards, European-style government buildings, and geometric road patterns. It was intended to be a monument to British authority, segregating colonial rulers from the native Indian population.

Post-independence, New Delhi remained India’s capital, and today it is one of the world’s largest metropolitan areas, with a booming economy and a blend of colonial and modernist architecture.

 

2. Jakarta, Indonesia (Dutch East Indies)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~11 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~661 km²
πŸš† Dutch-built canals: Over 110 km (many still in use today)

Originally named Batavia, Jakarta was founded in 1619 by the Dutch East India Company (VOC). The Dutch meticulously planned the city with Amsterdam-style canals, aiming to facilitate trade and military defense. However, these canals became disease-ridden, leading to devastating malaria outbreaks in the 18th and 19th centuries.

Post-independence, Jakarta grew into Indonesia’s economic powerhouse, but colonial infrastructure contributed to its severe flooding problems, as many canals were poorly maintained or repurposed for informal housing.

 

3. Hanoi, Vietnam (French Indochina)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~8 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~3,358 km²
πŸ› French-built districts: 4 major colonial zones

Under French rule (1887–1954), Hanoi was transformed into the administrative capital of French Indochina. The French introduced:

  • Boulevards mimicking Paris, such as the iconic TrΓ ng Tiền Street.
  • European-style villas and government buildings.
  • Zoning policies that segregated French officials and Vietnamese locals.

Today, Hanoi still showcases its French colonial heritage, particularly in the Old Quarter, blending Vietnamese traditions with French-influenced urban design.

 

4. Nairobi, Kenya (British Empire)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~5.5 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~696 km²
πŸš‚ Founded as a railway depot (1899) for the Uganda Railway

The British founded Nairobi in 1899 as a railway hub for the Uganda Railway, but it quickly evolved into British East Africa’s colonial capital. The city was designed with rigid racial segregation, ensuring that Europeans occupied the best areas, while Africans and South Asians were pushed into underdeveloped districts.

Even today, inequalities in Nairobi’s urban landscape trace back to its colonial foundations. The city remains a major financial and diplomatic hub, but issues like poor infrastructure, wealth disparity, and informal settlements are remnants of British planning policies.

 

5. Manila, Philippines (Spanish & American Colonialism)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~14 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~636 km²
πŸ’° American redevelopment cost (1905–1915): $8 million (Equivalent to ~$250 million today)

Manila was initially shaped by the Spanish (1571–1898), with its Intramuros district built as a walled city to protect against invasions. After the U.S. took control in 1898, American planners, including Daniel Burnham, redesigned Manila with:

  • A grand waterfront boulevard (Roxas Boulevard).
  • Modernized road networks inspired by Washington D.C.
  • Public parks and new zoning laws.

Today, Manila is a complex mix of Spanish, American, and modern influences, reflecting its long colonial history.

 

6. BrasΓ­lia, Brazil (Portuguese Colonial Influence & Modernist Planning)

πŸ“Œ Population (2023): ~3 million
πŸ“ Land Area: ~5,802 km²
πŸ— Built in 41 months (1956–1960), costing $10 billion today)

While not a direct colonial city, BrasΓ­lia reflects Portuguese colonial urban planning concepts—centralized power, controlled expansion, and grand symbolic architecture. Designed by LΓΊcio Costa and Oscar Niemeyer, BrasΓ­lia was built entirely from scratch in just four years, replacing Rio de Janeiro as Brazil’s capital.

However, its strict zoning policies led to inequality, with elite government officials living in prime areas while the majority commuted from distant satellite towns.

 

Conclusion: The Lasting Impact of Colonial Urban Planning

Colonial cities were not just places of governance—they were built as instruments of control, designed for economic extraction, racial segregation, and political dominance. Many of these cities have since evolved, but their colonial-era foundations still shape modern urban challenges:

  • New Delhi’s grand avenues still serve as India’s political core.
  • Jakarta’s canals remain a flood-prone legacy of Dutch planning.
  • Nairobi’s zoning policies continue to affect housing inequality.
  • Manila’s American-built roads define its urban layout even today.

The legacy of colonial planning is still deeply embedded in these cities, often contributing to modern issues like traffic congestion, social inequality, and outdated infrastructure. While many have modernized, the shadows of colonialism still linger.


Read more about urban history: 

The transformation of Chinese cities (2000-2025): The rise of China’s megacities

Wednesday, December 10, 2025

Daniel Burnham: The Man Who Planned the Future of Cities

Meet Daniel Burnham, the visionary behind the 1909 Plan of Chicago, one of the most influential urban plans in history. His designs weren’t just about beauty—they were about efficiency, mobility, and making cities places people wanted to live in. He believed in bold visions, grand architecture, and transforming chaotic urban sprawl into well-organized, monumental spaces.

But how did Burnham come up with his ideas? And how did the 1909 Chicago Plan change the city forever? Stay with me as we explore the story of a man who believed in "Make no little plans" and forever changed urban life.




 

Early Life and Career: The Architect of the Future


Born in 1846, Daniel Burnham started his career in architecture but soon realized that buildings alone weren’t enough—entire cities needed better planning. By the late 19th century, Chicago was booming. The population had exploded from 30,000 in 1850 to over 1.7 million by 1900. But with that growth came problems: overcrowding, poor sanitation, traffic congestion, and lack of green space.

Burnham had already made a name for himself as the director of the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition, where he transformed 600 acres of swampy land into a stunning neoclassical "White City" that attracted over 27 million visitors. The success of this fair proved that urban design could be both beautiful and functional, inspiring Burnham’s future city planning ideas.

 

The 1909 Plan of Chicago: A Bold Vision


At the turn of the century, Chicago was growing faster than any city in the world. But with rapid growth came chaos—narrow streets, pollution, and slums. Burnham, alongside his partner Edward Bennett, took on the ambitious task of redesigning the entire city with the Plan of Chicago, published in 1909.

This plan was revolutionary. It proposed:

  • A citywide road system with grand boulevards and diagonal streets for better traffic flow.
  • A massive lakefront park system, ensuring that the entire Chicago lakefront remained public land.
  • A network of parks and green spaces, to improve quality of life.
  • A new, efficient rail and freight system to reduce congestion.
  • Civic and cultural centers, including a majestic central plaza inspired by European cities.

One of the most audacious ideas? A completely restructured lakefront, turning what was once industrial land into over 25 miles of uninterrupted public parks and beaches—a feature that defines Chicago to this day.

 

Transforming Chicago: What Was Actually Built?


The Plan of Chicago wasn’t just an idea—it shaped real, lasting changes. Over the next decades, the following have been fulfilled. 

  • Grant Park was expanded, becoming Chicago’s "front yard," home to landmarks like Millennium Park and the Art Institute of Chicago.
  • The city developed a network of parks and forest preserves, adding thousands of acres of green space.
  • Wacker Drive was constructed, following Burnham’s vision for multilayered roads that separated commercial and pedestrian traffic.
  • The rail system was restructured, leading to modern commuter transit improvements.

But not everything in the plan came to life. Burnham envisioned monumental civic centers and grand European-style boulevards that never fully materialized. Still, his ideas inspired countless city planners across the U.S., leading to better city layouts in Washington D.C., San Francisco, and even overseas in Manila.

 

Beyond Chicago: Burnham’s Global Influence


Burnham’s genius wasn’t limited to Chicago. His planning ideas influenced:

  • Washington D.C. – He redesigned the National Mall, shaping it into the monumental space we know today.
  • San Francisco – After the 1906 earthquake, he proposed a radical redesign of the city, though it was never fully realized.
  • Manila and Baguio (Philippines) – Burnham’s master plan for Manila featured wide boulevards, waterfront parks, and grand civic buildings, some of which still exist today.

His influence laid the foundation for modern urban planning, inspiring the City Beautiful Movement, which emphasized grand, organized, and aesthetically pleasing city designs.

 

The Legacy of Daniel Burnham


More than a century later, Daniel Burnham’s vision still shapes Chicago and countless other cities. His ideas about green space, transportation, and urban beauty remain cornerstones of city planning today. His "Make no little plans" philosophy reminds us that cities should be designed for both function and inspiration.

So, next time you walk through Chicago’s downtown, Washington D.C.’s National Mall, or even parts of Manila, remember that one man’s big dreams and bold ideas helped create the cities we know today.


More about the history of urban planning:

The history of Indian railways: Colonial beginnings, overcrowding, and socioeconomic impacts


Friday, November 22, 2024

Top 10 Metro and Light Rail Systems in Southeast Asia Ranked

 Southeast Asia is home to some of the world’s fastest-growing cities, each grappling with the challenges of urbanization, congestion, and sustainability. Metro systems have emerged as transformative solutions, reducing traffic, cutting emissions, and making cities more livable. But not all systems are created equal. Today, we’ll rank the top 10 metro systems in Southeast Asia, considering factors like efficiency, technology, coverage, sustainability, and user experience. Each system is scored out of 100, with 100 representing world-class excellence.


1. Singapore MRT (Score: 100)

Singapore’s Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) leads the pack with its unparalleled efficiency, seamless integration, and forward-thinking design. Since its launch in 1987, the MRT has grown to over 200 kilometers of track and more than 130 stations, covering the entire island.

With an average daily ridership of 3.5 million, the MRT is known for punctuality, boasting a reliability rate of 99.8%—one of the highest globally. Its EZ-Link card system simplifies payments across trains, buses, and taxis, reflecting Singapore's emphasis on connectivity.

The MRT’s eco-friendly initiatives, like regenerative braking systems and naturally ventilated stations, save millions of kilowatt-hours annually. The recently added Thomson-East Coast Line reduced commuter times by as much as 50%, underscoring its impact on daily life. Images of ultra-modern stations and green corridors surrounding the tracks showcase the MRT as a model for urban mobility.

 

2. Bangkok BTS and MRT (Score: 94)

Bangkok’s Skytrain (BTS) and underground MRT form a dynamic duo that revolutionized commuting in Thailand’s capital. The BTS started in 1999 with two lines, now spanning over 70 kilometers, while the MRT began in 2004 and covers an additional 54 kilometers.

Together, they carry 1.3 million passengers daily, significantly alleviating Bangkok’s notorious traffic. The elevated BTS tracks offer breathtaking views of the cityscape, while MRT stations feature contemporary Thai art.

The efficiency of these systems is reflected in their 97% on-time performance and seamless connections to river ferries and airports. Future expansions, like the MRT Orange Line, promise to bring coverage to underserved areas. Bangkok's network balances innovation with cultural identity, making it both functional and iconic.

 

3. Kuala Lumpur LRT & MRT (Score: 89)

Kuala Lumpur boasts a sophisticated rail system that integrates Light Rail Transit (LRT), Monorail, and MRT lines. Collectively spanning over 170 kilometers, these systems handle 2 million passengers daily across the Klang Valley.

The Kelana Jaya Line stands out as Southeast Asia’s first driverless metro, while the MRT Sungai Buloh-Kajang Line set a benchmark for sustainable construction. Stations like Bukit Bintang showcase a mix of modernity and local culture, creating an inviting environment for commuters.

The system’s cashless ticketing, real-time arrival data, and future-proof expansions, including the MRT Putrajaya Line, elevate Kuala Lumpur’s transit ecosystem. The network’s emphasis on energy efficiency and integration has positioned it as a leader in urban connectivity.

 

4. Jakarta MRT (Score: 84)

Indonesia’s bustling capital took a major leap forward with the Jakarta MRT, launched in 2019. Initially covering 16 kilometers and serving 200,000 passengers daily, the MRT plans to expand to over 230 kilometers by 2030.

The MRT has reduced travel times between key areas by up to 50%, providing a reliable alternative to Jakarta’s infamous traffic. Energy-efficient trains and green urban spaces around stations reflect its commitment to sustainability.

While still in its early stages, the Jakarta MRT has demonstrated the transformative potential of urban rail. The government’s ambitious vision, combined with positive user feedback, suggests a bright future for the system.

 

5. Manila Metro (Score: 78)

The Manila MRT, one of Southeast Asia’s oldest, has served the Philippines’ capital since 1984. Despite carrying over 1.3 million passengers daily, the system has faced challenges like aging infrastructure and overcrowding.

Planned upgrades include air-conditioned trains, improved ticketing systems, and extensions to suburban areas. The MRT3 line, running along the bustling EDSA highway, remains a vital artery for Manila’s commuters.

While the system’s reliability has room for improvement, ongoing modernization efforts aim to restore the network’s former glory. Manila’s metro is a testament to resilience and the importance of investing in public transit.

 

6. Hanoi Metro (Score: 72)

Hanoi’s first metro line, the Cat Linh-Ha Dong Line, opened in 2021, marking a new chapter for Vietnam’s capital. Covering 13 kilometers and serving 12,000 passengers daily, it represents a modest start with ambitious plans for growth.

By 2030, Hanoi aims to build a network of 318 kilometers, reducing congestion and emissions. The line’s sleek trains and vibrant station interiors symbolize the city’s modernization.

While currently limited in scope, Hanoi Metro showcases the potential of public transit to reshape urban mobility in emerging economies.

 

7. Ho Chi Minh City Metro (Score: 70)

Expected to launch in 2024, Ho Chi Minh City’s first metro line promises to revolutionize commuting in Vietnam’s largest city. The 19.7-kilometer Line 1 will connect downtown with suburban districts, aiming to serve 220,000 passengers daily in its initial phase.

Future expansions include six lines covering 200 kilometers, addressing the city’s growing transportation needs. Early visuals of stations and trains hint at a blend of modernity and functionality.

As the system comes online, it has the potential to become a cornerstone of urban development in Ho Chi Minh City.

 

8. Singapore LRT (Score: 68)

Singapore’s Light Rail Transit (LRT) system complements the MRT by providing first-mile, last-mile connectivity in suburban areas. Automated and efficient, the LRT handles over 600,000 daily passengers across three lines.

While smaller in scale than the MRT, the LRT plays a critical role in linking residential areas to the main transit network. Its compact design and real-time monitoring ensure reliability and ease of use.

The LRT is a testament to Singapore’s holistic approach to urban mobility, ensuring no commuter is left behind.

 

9. Bangkok Airport Rail Link (Score: 65)

Connecting Suvarnabhumi Airport to central Bangkok, the Airport Rail Link serves 70,000 passengers daily, offering speeds of up to 160 km/h. While not a full metro system, it enhances the city’s transit landscape.

The link’s efficiency and affordability make it a popular choice for travelers. As expansions tie it more closely to the BTS and MRT networks, its importance will only grow.

 

10. Phnom Penh Metro Vision (Score: 60)

While Phnom Penh is still in the planning stages of building its first metro, the proposed $1.8 billion project has generated significant excitement. Expected to serve 50,000 passengers daily, the system aims to reduce congestion and pollution in Cambodia’s capital.

Though yet to break ground, the project represents the aspirations of a city on the cusp of transformation. Early renderings suggest a sleek, efficient design that could set a new standard for transit in emerging markets.

 

Conclusion: Southeast Asia’s Transit Future

Southeast Asia’s metro systems are as diverse as the region itself. From Singapore’s world-class MRT to the emerging networks in Vietnam and Cambodia, these systems showcase the power of transit to shape cities. As urban populations grow, investing in efficient, sustainable metro networks will be essential for the region’s future. Each system on this list has contributed to this vision, proving that public transit is not just about moving people—it’s about connecting lives and building better cities.

More about public transportation:

Relations of Public Transport Use and Car Ownership with Neighbourhood and City-Level Travel Purposes in Kerman, Iran