How Parks Saved Cities

 Have you ever wondered how cities would feel without parks? Just concrete, steel, and noise. Sounds like a dystopian movie, right? But there’s a reason why cities around the world have fought to preserve and create green spaces. Parks haven’t just made cities prettier—they’ve literally saved them! From boosting public health to giving us a much-needed breather from urban chaos, parks are some of the most vital lungs in any city.

Today, we’re diving into the fascinating story of how parks helped save cities, with two prime examples: Central Park in New York and Copenhagen’s green spaces. Get ready to find out how a few acres of green can transform an entire urban jungle!

Central Park, New York: The Green Lung of the City

Let’s start with one of the most famous parks in the world: Central Park in New York City. In the mid-19th century, New York was growing at an astonishing rate. As immigrants poured in and industry boomed, the city’s landscape became increasingly crowded, dirty, and chaotic.

In 1858, landscape architects Frederick Law Olmsted and Calvert Vaux won a competition to design Central Park, a vast green space right in the middle of the metropolis. But Central Park wasn’t just about aesthetics — it was a public health project!

Fun fact

Central Park spans 843 acres, which is larger than some countries! (Sorry, I mean Monaco.)

The park was designed to be the “lungs” of the city, offering fresh air and a place for New Yorkers to escape the suffocating urban environment. It provided a refuge where people could stroll, relax, and, most importantly, breathe. Remember, this was a time before air conditioning and modern public health standards.

Olmsted and Vaux believed that access to nature would improve the well-being of city dwellers, and they were right. Research today shows that green spaces like Central Park reduce stress, improve mental health, and even lower the risk of cardiovascular disease. It’s almost like a giant natural therapist in the middle of the city!

And let's be real—without Central Park, where else would you jog, do yoga, or awkwardly picnic while dodging frisbees in New York?

Data point

Over 42 million people visit Central Park each year, making it one of the most visited urban parks in the world. That’s roughly the population of Poland—visiting one park!

 

Copenhagen: A City That Prioritizes Green Spaces

Now, let’s head over to Copenhagen, Denmark—a city that’s taken urban green spaces to a whole new level. Unlike New York, where Central Park was built to offset the problems of rapid industrialization, Copenhagen’s parks were carefully woven into its urban planning from the beginning.

In recent decades, Copenhagen has gained a reputation as one of the most livable cities in the world, and a big reason for that is the way they integrate green spaces into the fabric of the city. The city’s planners weren’t just thinking about aesthetics—they were planning for public health, community interaction, and sustainability.

Fun fact

Over 60% of Copenhagen’s residents live within 300 meters of a green space. This isn’t just a coincidence—it’s deliberate!

One standout example is Superkilen Park, a park that’s also a global art project, showcasing design elements from 60 different countries to reflect the city’s diverse population. It’s more than just a place to relax; it’s a park that celebrates cultural diversity and fosters community bonding.

But Copenhagen didn’t stop at one park. The city has been systematically increasing its green spaces through initiatives like the Finger Plan, which ensures that urban development is always balanced with parks and green corridors. Copenhagen’s planners understood something crucial: green spaces aren’t just a luxury—they’re essential for a city’s health and sustainability.

Data point

Studies show that Copenhagen’s focus on green spaces has led to higher life satisfaction, and residents rank their quality of life 13% higher compared to other European cities. That’s the power of parks!

And Copenhagen isn’t just resting on its laurels. They’re aiming to be the world’s first carbon-neutral city by 2025, and green spaces are a big part of that goal. Parks help reduce the urban heat island effect, provide wildlife habitats, and even absorb carbon dioxide, making them crucial in the fight against climate change.

 

Parks and Walkability: A Win for Sustainable Transportation

Now, we can’t talk about parks without discussing walkability. Parks often serve as the hub for walking paths, biking trails, and sustainable transportation routes. They give people a reason to walk instead of drive, and that’s a big win for cities trying to reduce car dependency.

In cities like London, for instance, green spaces like Hyde Park and Regent’s Park serve as key components of the city’s walkability plan. They make it easier—and more enjoyable—for people to choose walking or biking over driving, contributing to a more sustainable urban future.

Fun fact: In cities with well-designed green spaces, residents are more likely to walk an extra 15 minutes a day, according to urban studies. Those extra steps might not seem like much, but over time, they contribute to lower obesity rates and improved cardiovascular health.

 

The Numbers Speak for Themselves

When you look at the numbers, it’s clear that parks aren’t just a “nice to have” — they’re a lifeline for cities:

• In 2020, a study found that access to parks and green spaces in the U.S. increased life expectancy by an average of 2.5 years in urban areas.
• Parks can increase nearby property values by 20-30%, which means they’re not only good for health but also for the economy.
• During the COVID-19 pandemic, park usage in many cities increased by up to 60%, showing just how critical these spaces are in times of crisis.

 

Conclusion: How Parks Saved Cities

From the creation of Central Park in New York to the forward-thinking green spaces of Copenhagen, parks have saved cities in more ways than one. They’ve improved our physical and mental health, enhanced social interaction, boosted the local economy, and even helped tackle climate change.

The next time you take a stroll through a park, remember that you’re not just enjoying a bit of nature — you’re walking through one of the most important, life-saving features your city has to offer.

So, whether you’re in a bustling city like New York or a sustainable haven like Copenhagen, take a moment to appreciate the green spaces around you — because parks aren’t just nice—they’re essential.

Read more about green design:

The Skyscraper, Green Design, & the LEED Green Building Rating System: The Creation of Uniform Sustainable Standards for the 2 1 st Century or the Perpetuation of an Architectural Fiction?

Tackling eco-urbanity: Housing and placemaking at the urban edge

Seven Rules for Sustainable Communities: Design Strategies for the Post-Carbon World

Bridges to Utopia? A Sustainable Urban District in Freiburg, Germany

The new district of Freiburg-Rieselfeld: a case study of successful, sustainable urban development

Skyscrapers: Why Cities Keep Building Up

Skyscrapers: those towering giants that define the skyline of every major city. But why are cities so obsessed with building up? Why do we keep pushing the limits of engineering and architecture to reach for the skies?

Well, today, we’re exploring the fascinating history of skyscrapers, from their humble beginnings in New York to the dizzying heights of Dubai. Buckle up, because it’s time to get high… up in the air, that is! 

Empire State Building: A Symbol of Ambition

Let’s kick things off with one of the most iconic skyscrapers of all time — the Empire State Building. Built during the Great Depression in 1931, this New York landmark not only changed the city’s skyline but also set the stage for the skyscraper boom that followed.

Fun fact: At the time of its completion, the Empire State Building was the tallest building in the world, standing at 1,454 feet (including its antenna). That’s about the height of four Statue of Liberties stacked on top of each other!

The construction of this 102-story giant was a feat of engineering and sheer determination. Believe it or not, workers completed the Empire State Building in just 410 days, an incredible pace for a structure of this magnitude. Over 10 million bricks were used in its construction, and it cost around $41 million — which may not sound like much today, but adjusted for inflation, that’s over $600 million in today’s dollars!

But why build something so tall in the first place?

The answer, in part, is land scarcity. Cities like New York had limited space, but a growing population and demand for office space meant the only direction to go was up. And it wasn’t just about space — skyscrapers became symbols of progress, power, and economic strength. The higher you went, the more you showcased your ambition as a city.

And once the race for height began, there was no turning back.

 

The Burj Khalifa: The Pinnacle of Modern Skyscrapers

Fast forward almost a century, and we find ourselves in Dubai, home to the tallest structure ever built by humans: the Burj Khalifa.

Completed in 2010, the Burj Khalifa reaches a staggering 2,717 feet into the sky — almost twice the height of the Empire State Building. This 163-story behemoth required 330,000 cubic meters of concrete, 39,000 tons of steel, and about 22 million man-hours to build. Talk about a massive project!

But here’s where it gets even crazier. The Burj Khalifa isn’t just tall for the sake of being tall. It was designed to solidify Dubai’s place on the map as a global city, an architectural marvel that screams, “Look at us! We’re a major player on the world stage!”

Fun fact: The Burj Khalifa is visible from 60 miles away on a clear day. That’s like standing in New York City and seeing something from the next state over!

But why are cities like Dubai so obsessed with building taller and taller? The answer is multifaceted. Skyscrapers have become a form of global city competition — a way for cities to show off their wealth, modernity, and technological prowess. In the case of Dubai, a city with vast amounts of desert but not much vertical development, the Burj Khalifa helped redefine its urban identity.

And Dubai isn’t the only place with a skyscraper obsession.

 

China’s Skyscraper Boom: A Race to the Sky

Let’s head over to China, where the skyline is changing faster than ever before. In fact, China is home to more than half of the world’s skyscrapers taller than 150 meters (492 feet). One of the most impressive examples is the Shanghai Tower, the second tallest building in the world, standing at 2,073 feet.

What’s driving this skyscraper boom in China? Well, it’s a combination of rapid urbanization and economic growth. As millions of people move to cities for better job opportunities, demand for housing and office space has skyrocketed. And just like New York and Dubai, cities in China have limited land, so the solution is to go up, up, and up.

Fun fact: In 2019, China completed 56 new skyscrapers — more than any other country that year. That’s more than one new skyscraper every week!

 

The Economics of Skyscrapers

So, we’ve established that skyscrapers help solve the problem of land scarcity, but there’s also an economic argument for going tall. High-rise buildings allow cities to maximize the value of their land, especially in dense urban areas where land is expensive.

Take Hong Kong for example. The city is home to some of the most expensive real estate in the world, and its skyline is packed with towering skyscrapers. With little available land and high demand for housing and office space, developers in cities like Hong Kong often have no choice but to build vertically.

But skyscrapers aren’t just about space and economics — they’re also about prestige.

Skyscrapers as Status Symbols

In many cities, skyscrapers have become status symbols. They represent innovation, power, and the future. Cities with iconic skyscrapers — think New York’s One World Trade Center or London’s The Shard — become tourist destinations in their own right, attracting millions of visitors who want to take in the views from the top.

And let’s not forget about sustainability. While early skyscrapers weren’t known for being eco-friendly, modern buildings like The Shard or Taipei 101 are often designed with green technology in mind. These buildings use energy-efficient systems, recycle water, and even generate their own power, showing that skyscrapers can be part of a more sustainable future.

 

The Future of Skyscrapers: How High Can We Go?

Now, you might be wondering — how high can we go? Is there a limit?

Well, as it turns out, we’re not quite done yet. Engineers and architects are already working on designs for buildings that could reach 3,280 feet (1,000 meters) or more, like the Jeddah Tower in Saudi Arabia, which, when completed, will be taller than the Burj Khalifa.

But it’s not just about going taller. Cities are also thinking about how to make these towering giants more livable, with innovations like sky gardens, mixed-use spaces, and even vertical farming.

 

Conclusion: Why Cities Keep Building Up

So, why do cities keep building up? It’s a combination of land scarcity, economic necessity, global competition, and the desire for prestige. Skyscrapers are not just buildings — they’re symbols of ambition, progress, and the future of urban life.

From the Empire State Building to the Burj Khalifa, skyscrapers have shaped our cities and our imaginations. And as we look to the future, it’s clear that the race to the sky is far from over.

The 3 Most Successful Examples of Urban Planning in Modern India

Urban planning in India has transformed cities into models of growth and sustainability. Let’s explore three success stories!

1. Chandigarh – Designed by the legendary architect Le Corbusier in the 1950s, Chandigarh is India’s first planned city. With a population of over 1.1 million, it boasts a grid layout, wide roads, and extensive green spaces covering 49% of the city area. The city’s zoning system separates residential, commercial, and industrial areas, reducing congestion and pollution.
2. GIFT City, Gujarat – Launched in 2011, GIFT (Gujarat International Finance Tec-City
   ) is India’s first smart city. Spanning over 886 acres, it’s designed to compete with global financial hubs like Singapore and Dubai. It features 100% waste recycling, a district cooling system, and India’s tallest tower at 122 meters. With over 225 companies already set up, it’s driving India's fintech revolution.
3. Navi Mumbai – Built in the 1970s to decongest Mumbai, Navi Mumbai covers 344 sq km and houses 1.2 million people. Known for its efficient public transport and green belts, it’s ranked among India’s top sustainable cities.

 More about India:

TOWARDS A SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT SYSTEM: PLANNING FOR NON-MOTORIZED VEHICLES IN CITIES

Asian cities at highest risk to climate change, study says

Paratransit for mobility impaired persons in developing regions: Starting up and scaling up

Public Transport Research Challenges in India

Raising Public Awareness about Sustainable Urban Transport

How Highways Ruined Cities?

Highways — the veins of modern cities, moving millions of cars and trucks every day. But here’s the dirty secret: these highways didn’t just connect cities; they ruined them. Yes, the same roads that make your morning commute possible also tore apart thriving neighborhoods, displaced thousands of families, and left gaping wounds in the heart of cities.

Today, we’re diving into “How Highways Ruined Cities,” exploring how the U.S. interstate system and figures like Robert Moses reshaped — or rather, disfigured — the urban landscape. So buckle up, because this ride isn’t pretty.

The U.S. Interstate Highway System: A Dream Turns Sour

Let’s start with the U.S. Interstate Highway System, a project hailed as one of the greatest achievements in American infrastructure. It all began in 1956 with the Federal-Aid Highway Act, which launched the construction of over 41,000 miles of highways across the United States. The goal? To link every major city, boost the economy, and make driving more efficient.

Sounds great, right? Well, here’s the catch: highways didn’t just pass through empty fields. They were often built right through urban neighborhoods, especially in low-income areas and communities of color. And nowhere was this more destructive than in cities like Detroit.

 

Detroit and the I-375 Freeway

Detroit was once the beating heart of the American automotive industry, but its story took a sharp detour with the construction of highways like I-375. Built in the 1960s, I-375 plowed through the heart of Black Bottom and Paradise Valley — two thriving African American neighborhoods filled with businesses, jazz clubs, and homes.

In its place? A concrete scar.

The construction of I-375 displaced over 100,000 residents and destroyed nearly 2,800 homes. Black Bottom, once a vibrant cultural hub, was literally bulldozed to make way for a highway that ultimately contributed to Detroit’s economic and social decline. The new highway severed the community from the downtown area and made it harder for businesses to thrive.

But Detroit wasn’t alone in this story of urban destruction.

 

Robert Moses: The Man Who Shaped (and Dismantled) New York City

Now, we can’t talk about highways and their impact without mentioning Robert Moses, the man behind many of New York City’s highways, bridges, and parks. Moses was a visionary urban planner, but he had a notorious obsession with building roads — no matter the cost.

Between the 1930s and 1960s, Moses constructed over 13 expressways across New York City, including the Cross Bronx Expressway and Brooklyn-Queens Expressway. His projects displaced more than 250,000 residents across the city, forever altering its landscape.

 

The Cross Bronx Expressway

Let’s zoom in on the Cross Bronx Expressway. When Moses proposed this six-lane highway in the late 1940s, it cut through one of the most densely populated and stable neighborhoods in the Bronx — East Tremont.

Fun fact (but not so fun for residents): To make way for the highway, Moses bulldozed through 600 apartment buildings, displacing around 60,000 people. The expressway severed the Bronx, dividing it into northern and southern halves. Property values plummeted, and entire communities were left devastated by noise pollution, increased traffic, and worsening air quality.

Over the decades, the Bronx saw a rise in crime and poverty, with some blaming the Cross Bronx Expressway for accelerating the borough’s decline in the 1970s. This once-thriving middle-class neighborhood was left in ruins, and Moses’s grand vision of efficiency came at the expense of the people who lived there.

 

Why Highways Targeted Certain Communities

But why were these highways always cutting through minority and low-income neighborhoods? Well, it wasn’t by accident. In fact, redlining and racist housing policies played a huge role.

Redlining, a practice where banks and insurance companies refused to offer loans or coverage in predominantly Black neighborhoods, left these areas vulnerable. Since they were deemed "undesirable," city planners saw them as the perfect location for highways, thinking it was better to build there than through affluent, politically powerful communities.

The result? Urban decay, the collapse of vibrant neighborhoods, and the rise of suburban sprawl, as wealthier, predominantly white residents fled to the suburbs, leaving the city’s core to rot.

Highways were kind of like the original “ghosting” — except instead of disappearing from a text conversation, people disappeared from entire neighborhoods.

 

The Suburban Dream and Urban Decline

Highways didn’t just destroy urban neighborhoods; they fueled the suburban dream. In the post-war era, Americans were eager to leave the crowded, noisy city for the spacious, picket-fenced suburbs. The new highway system made this possible by enabling people to live farther from their jobs and still commute relatively easily.

By the 1960s, over 60 million Americans had moved to the suburbs, encouraged by government incentives like low-interest home loans and, of course, the sprawling network of interstate highways. Cities, meanwhile, were left with declining tax bases, abandoned buildings, and neighborhoods torn apart by the very highways meant to connect them.

Fun fact: Between 1950 and 1980, cities like St. Louis and Cleveland lost nearly half their populations as residents fled to the suburbs. This hollowing-out of cities contributed to the rise of urban blight — abandoned, decaying buildings that stood in stark contrast to the shiny new suburban developments.

 

The Environmental Costs of Highways

It’s not just communities that paid the price for highways; the environment suffered too. Highways encourage car dependency, which means more traffic, more fuel consumption, and more greenhouse gas emissions. In fact, transportation is responsible for nearly 30% of all U.S. carbon emissions, with highways playing a major role.

Moreover, the construction of highways often led to the destruction of natural habitats and green spaces. For example, when Interstate 5 was built along the West Coast, it cut through wetlands, forests, and wildlife habitats, leaving a trail of ecological damage in its wake.

 

Can We Fix It? The Future of Highways

So, after all this damage, is there any hope for our cities? Well, some cities are starting to recognize the havoc highways have wreaked and are working to undo the damage.

Take San Francisco, for example. After the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake damaged the Embarcadero Freeway, the city decided not to rebuild it. Instead, they replaced it with a beautiful waterfront boulevard and public spaces, reconnecting the city with its bay. Property values shot up, tourism increased, and the area became one of San Francisco’s most vibrant neighborhoods.

Another example is Rochester, New York, which removed a portion of its inner loop highway in 2017. By filling in the road and replacing it with housing, bike lanes, and pedestrian paths, the city was able to revitalize the downtown area and promote sustainable urban living.

 

Conclusion: Highways Shaped, and Sometimes Destroyed, Our Cities

Highways were built to bring us together, but they ended up tearing many communities apart. From Detroit’s Black Bottom to New York’s East Tremont, the legacy of highways is one of displacement, environmental damage, and urban decay.

But it doesn’t have to stay this way. Cities around the world are rethinking their relationship with highways, focusing on public transit, walkability, and reconnecting neighborhoods that were once divided.

The secret to a healthy city isn’t more highways — it’s more human-centered design. After all, cities are for people, not cars.

The Secret Mini-History of Sidewalks

 The Secret Mini-History of Sidewalks

Ah, sidewalks. We see them every day, walk on them, sometimes even skateboard or jog across them. But have you ever stopped to wonder, “Where did these things come from? And why do we even need them?” Well, my friends, sidewalks have a story, and it's way more fascinating than you think.

Today, we're diving into "The Secret History of Sidewalks," and how these humble paths shaped cities, impacted human mobility, and influenced walkability. By the end, you’ll see why sidewalks are not just slabs of concrete but the backbone of sustainable urban living.

Ancient Beginnings: Rome’s First Sidewalks

Let’s kick things off with the Romans. Ah yes, the Romans — those city planners extraordinaire who gave us aqueducts, roads, and even, drumroll please… sidewalks! Okay, they didn’t call them that, but they had raised footpaths alongside their Viae — those famous Roman roads that connected the empire.

These early sidewalks weren’t just for keeping pedestrians' feet dry when it rained; they were an early safety feature. The Romans realized that if you didn’t want to be run over by a horse-drawn cart, it was probably a good idea to have a separate, elevated area for walking. Genius, right?

Take Pompeii as an example. Excavations revealed raised stone sidewalks along their streets, with stepping stones so pedestrians could cross the road without stepping into muck or traffic. Rome’s footpaths were revolutionary for their time, emphasizing pedestrian safety in a world dominated by animal-powered vehicles.

 

Paris: Haussmann’s Vision and the Birth of the Modern Sidewalk

Fast forward to 19th-century Paris, where the city was undergoing a massive transformation. You can thank Baron Haussmann for the sidewalks we know today. Before Haussmann, Paris was a congested mess of narrow, medieval streets. Pedestrians had to squeeze past horses, carriages, and street vendors in conditions that were, let’s say… not ideal.

In the mid-1800s, Haussmann was commissioned by Emperor Napoleon III to redesign Paris, and one of his key contributions was wider streets with dedicated sidewalks. No more dodging carriages and manure — pedestrians now had designated zones to walk, shop, and socialize safely. And it wasn’t just about foot traffic; Haussmann’s broad sidewalks helped turn streets into social spaces. Cafés began to line these new boulevards, and Paris became a model for modern urban design.

Fun Fact: Haussmann’s sidewalks were also paved, unlike earlier dirt paths, which made them much more functional and pleasant to walk on, rain or shine.

 

Case Study: New York City’s Sidewalk Explosion

Now let’s hop across the Atlantic to New York City, where sidewalks exploded in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. With the city's rapid growth and industrialization, it needed to accommodate not just pedestrians but the influx of immigrants and urban workers.

By 1890, New York City had more than 350 miles of paved sidewalks, setting the stage for the modern city as we know it. Sidewalks in New York soon became bustling places where urban life happened — street vendors, kids playing stickball, and neighbors chatting outside their brownstones. Today, sidewalks in Manhattan can get as crowded as roads!

Ever tried walking through Times Square at rush hour? Good luck. You’ll feel like a sardine in a can!

 

Sidewalks and Walkability: The Forgotten Link to Urban Health

But sidewalks aren’t just about history — they are essential to walkability and sustainable transportation today. Urban planners now see sidewalks as crucial to making cities more livable, sustainable, and healthy. A well-designed sidewalk encourages active transportation like walking, biking, or even skating — modes of transit that are not only eco-friendly but also boost public health.

Take Copenhagen for example. It’s known for being one of the world’s most walkable and bike-friendly cities. Wide, continuous sidewalks and safe pedestrian crossings are integrated throughout the city, encouraging people to leave their cars behind and opt for walking or cycling. In fact, 41% of all trips in Copenhagen are made on foot or by bike. Copenhagen’s example shows how investing in good pedestrian infrastructure can reduce traffic congestion and lower CO2 emissions.

And let’s be real — you don’t have to go to the gym if you walk everywhere. Your sidewalk can double as your treadmill!

 

Case Study: Walkability in Curitiba, Brazil

Let’s also look at Curitiba, Brazil, a city globally recognized for its urban planning. In the 1970s, visionary mayor Jaime Lerner transformed the city with a focus on public spaces and pedestrian zones. One of his landmark projects was creating Rua XV de Novembro, the first major pedestrian street in Brazil.

Curitiba’s sidewalks are wide and well-maintained, designed to accommodate both foot traffic and street-level activities like outdoor markets. These improvements enhanced walkability, reduced traffic, and encouraged public transit use, making the city a model for sustainable urban development.

Curitiba’s success shows how prioritizing sidewalks and public spaces can create healthier, more vibrant urban environments.

 

The Problem of Sidewalk Inequality

But let’s not pretend it’s all smooth walking. Not all sidewalks are created equal, and some cities struggle with sidewalk inequality. In many U.S. cities, particularly low-income neighborhoods, sidewalks are incomplete or poorly maintained. A study by the National Complete Streets Coalition found that 43% of pedestrian deaths happen where sidewalks are missing or inadequate.

For example, in Los Angeles, a city notorious for its car dependency, nearly 40% of the city’s sidewalks are cracked or damaged. This makes walking not only inconvenient but also dangerous, particularly for people with disabilities, children, and the elderly.

 

The Future: Sidewalks and Smart Cities

Looking ahead, sidewalks are playing a central role in the development of smart cities. In places like Barcelona and Singapore, sidewalks are being integrated with smart technology — from sensors that monitor foot traffic to solar-powered panels that generate electricity as people walk.

These innovations aren’t just cool tech; they’re practical too. Data from smart sidewalks can help city planners optimize routes, manage crowds, and even identify maintenance issues before they become dangerous.

 

Conclusion: Sidewalks Matter

So next time you walk down the street, remember — sidewalks aren’t just a convenience. They’re a critical part of urban life that shapes how we move, interact, and build healthier, more sustainable cities. From ancient Rome to today’s smart cities, sidewalks have played a huge role in shaping urban development.

And that’s the secret history of sidewalks. Thanks for walking with us through time. Now, go take a stroll and appreciate that piece of concrete under your feet.

Similar posts:

Active Mobility: Bringing Together Transport Planning, Urban Planning, and Public Health

Cyclability in Lahore, Pakistan: Looking into Potential for Greener Urban Traveling

Urban Form and Mobility Choices: Informing about Sustainable Travel Alternatives, Carbon Emissions and Energy Use from Transportation in Swedish Neighbourhoods

Bicycling as a Way of Life: A Comparative Case Study of Bicycle Culture in Portland, OR and Amsterdam

Photos of bike lanes in Amsterdam, Netherlands (1)

Why Public Transit is Always Late (And How Cities Can Fix It)

This video deals with a short history of public transportation and also some of the reasons of its delays.

Public transit isn't a modern invention. In fact, cities have been working on ways to move people around for thousands of years. Take ancient Rome, for example. They had a system of carriages and wagons regulated to control traffic and congestion.

Watch this video here and learn more. 

 

The Roman Roots of Public Transit

Public transit isn't a modern invention. In fact, cities have been working on ways to move people around for thousands of years. Take ancient Rome, for example. They had a system of carriages and wagons regulated to control traffic and congestion.

Rome even had something like “bus lanes” — certain streets, known as banned streets, were off-limits to carts during daylight to reduce congestion. Sound familiar? It's like the early version of “No Delivery Trucks Before 10 AM”! But even back then, they couldn’t escape delays. Julius Caesar, the emperor himself, probably wasn’t immune to late arrivals due to traffic jams!

 

19th Century: Railroads and Streetcars

Fast-forward to the 19th century, and we enter the golden age of horse-drawn streetcars and railroads. The Industrial Revolution caused cities to expand rapidly, and with that came increased demand for transportation.

One key example is London, which was among the first to develop an extensive railway network. The London Underground — opened in 1863 — was groundbreaking but far from perfect. Within a few years, delays were frequent, caused by issues like:

• Overcrowding (sound familiar?).
• Mechanical failures (steam-powered engines would break down in tunnels).
• Congested tracks.

The situation was no better in Paris. When the Paris Métro opened in 1900, it faced similar struggles with overcrowding, breakdowns, and poor coordination — problems that still plague many transit systems today!

 

Why Public Transit is Late Today?

Now, why is public transit still late in 2024? Let’s break it down:

1. Traffic Congestion

Buses, the workhorses of many city transit systems, have to share the roads with everyone else. In New York City, for example, buses move at an average speed of just 7.4 miles per hour — yes, slower than you might walk in some areas like Manhattan!

According to a 2017 study, 30% of bus delays in major U.S. cities are due to traffic congestion, and the problem is only getting worse with increasing urbanization.

2. System Overcrowding

When transit systems don’t expand fast enough, overcrowding causes delays. Take Tokyo’s Yamanote Line, where station staff (known as oshiya) literally push people into trains during rush hour. More people = more time to board = more delays.

In Tokyo, 20% of train delays are attributed to overcrowding alone. During peak hours, the trains operate at 200% capacity, causing cascading delays throughout the network.

3. Infrastructure Failures

In the U.S., many transit systems operate on aging infrastructure. The Washington D.C. Metro, for instance, suffers frequent delays due to outdated tracks, signal failures, and deferred maintenance. According to a 2019 report, the Metro faced over 16,000 hours of delays due to infrastructure issues that year alone!

4. Coordination Problems

Running a transit system is a logistical nightmare. If one bus or train is late, it can have a domino effect across the entire system. In London, the so-called “knock-on effect” happens when one delayed train causes delays for all subsequent trains. One study showed that 30% of delays on the London Underground were due to such chain reactions.

 

Case Study: Mumbai’s Train Network

Now let’s look at Mumbai, where around 7.5 million people use the suburban rail system every day.

Overcrowding:

Mumbai’s suburban trains operate at 300% capacity during rush hours. No, that’s not a typo — it’s literally packed beyond human limits. This overcrowding means longer boarding times and frequent delays.

Lack of Modernization:

Despite its importance, Mumbai’s train system hasn’t kept pace with the city’s rapid growth. According to a 2018 study, 40% of train delays in Mumbai could be attributed to insufficient investment in modernizing the infrastructure.

---

Solutions: How Can Cities Fix Public Transit?

Now that we know why public transit is always late, how can cities solve this problem?

1. Dedicated Bus Lanes

Cities like Bogotá, Colombia have found success by giving buses their own lanes. The TransMilenio bus rapid transit system uses dedicated lanes, speeding up buses by 35% and reducing delays.

2. Automation & AI

Automation can help make transit systems more efficient. In Copenhagen, the Metro is fully automated, reducing human error and improving punctuality. Similarly, Tokyo is testing AI to predict delays and reroute trains in real-time. Early tests showed that AI could reduce delays by 20% during peak hours.

3. Infrastructure Investment

Cities like Seoul, South Korea, have invested heavily in modern infrastructure. In the last decade, Seoul spent over $50 billion modernizing its transit system, and the results speak for themselves. Seoul’s transit network is now among the most reliable in the world, with 95% of trains arriving on time.

4. Congestion Pricing

London’s Congestion Charge Zone has significantly reduced traffic in central London, cutting down bus delays by 12%. By charging cars to enter certain parts of the city, it frees up road space for buses.

5. Urban Design & Planning

Curitiba, Brazil, took a holistic approach to city planning. The city’s transit system prioritizes public transport by using prepaid boarding stations to speed up bus boarding times. This simple design change reduced boarding time by 30%, making the system more efficient overall.

 

The Future of Public Transit

Cities are experimenting with bold new ideas to make public transit not only more efficient but also more enjoyable.

Example: Singapore’s Smart Nation

Singapore is a world leader in smart transit technology. Using big data and AI, the city has developed a bus system that adjusts routes in real-time based on traffic patterns and demand. This has reduced bus delays by an impressive 25% and made the system much more responsive to passenger needs.

 

Conclusion

Will public transit ever be 100% on time? Probably not, but cities are finding creative ways to make it a lot better. Next time your bus or train is late, take a deep breath, and remember — at least you’re not stuck in a Roman chariot traffic jam! 

By including more detailed data and case studies, this version of the script gives viewers a clearer understanding of the various factors affecting public transit delays and the efforts made by cities across the world to improve their systems.

 

More about urban transportation:

Relations of Public Transport Use and Car Ownership with Neighbourhood and City-Level Travel Purposes in Kerman, Iran

System Dynamics Modeling and Fuzzy MCDM Approach as Support for Assessment of Sustainability Management on the Example of Transport Sector Company

The Land Use and Individual Correlates of Pedestrian Commuting: Who Walks to Their Work or Place of Study in the Large Cities of the MENA Region?

The Neighborhood Effect on Keeping Non-Commuting Journeys within Compact and Sprawled Districts