Like Urban Research on Facebook

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

The Master’s Degree Programme in Multidisciplinary Studies on Urban Environmental Issues (MURE), University of Helsinki, Finland

The Master’s Degree Programme in Multidisciplinary Studies on Urban Environmental Issues (MURE) started in the fall of 2010 (two academic years). The next round of the programme will start in the fall of 2012 (see Admissions). The goal of the programme is to respond, in part, to challenges brought about by urbanisation and environmental awareness. The programme pursues to understand and mitigate environmental problems due to urbanisation, such as human-induced impacts on the urban biota, changes to the hydrology and biogeochemistry of soil, terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, as well as their socioeconomic couplings and feedbacks. The emphasis of the programme is on urban environmental ecology, addressing terrestrial, soil and aquatic ecology as well as ecotoxicology and environmental chemistry. The major subject study of the programme is ecological and environmental sciences.

University of Helsinki, by bmevans80

University of Helsinki, by Habibi 81

more urban studies master programmes:

Master of Urban Design Studies- University of Toronto

Master of Urban and Regional Planning (MURP)-Portland State University

Master of City Planning in Boston University

Urban Planning Master's Program in Rutgers University

The 10 Best Graduate Programs In Urban And Regional Planning

Master in Urban Planning (MUP) in Harvard University

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Sustainable Residential Development in Urban Areas (Cities, Towns & Villages)

Government of Ireland

Forecast growth in the Irish economy and population indicates that strong demand for housing will continue with the number of homes in Ireland possibly rising from its current level of 1.8 million to over 2.5 million by 2020. With the majority of these houses to be built in urban areas, it is vitally important that this is achieved in a way which supports the development of sustainable, integrated neighbourhoods within our cities, towns and villages. In some cases, residential development will be part of a mixed use scheme, where there will be design challenges in ensuring the amenity of residents, but there are also inherent benefits if these challenges can be met.
The aim of these guidelines is to set out the key planning principles which should be reflected in development plans and local area plans, and which should guide the preparation and assessment of planning applications for residential development in urban areas.
These guidelines are accompanied by a non-statutory residential design manual prepared on behalf of the Department by a team of consultants led by O’Mahony Pike Planning Consultants. The best practice design manual is intended to be read in tandem with these guidelines, because it illustrates how policy principles can be translated into practice by developers and their design teams and by local authority planners. The design manual cites examples of good practice from across the spectrum of development locations, ranging from major brown-field sites to village infill sites. Also, “Green City Guidelines: Advice for the protection and enhancement of biodiversity in medium to high-density urban developments” (2008) are a useful reference for planning authorities and planning professionals.
These guidelines should also be read in conjunction with the Department’s planning guidelines on design standards for new apartments (which were published in September 2007). Those guidelines are also intended to promote sustainable housing, by ensuring that the design and layout of new apartments provide satisfactory accommodation for a variety of household types and sizes – including families with children - over the medium to long term.


A block interior in Vauban, Freiburg (an example of sustainable design), photo by Payton Chung
more about sustainable development:

BEST PRACTICE IN FACILITATING AND PROMOTING ACTIVE TRAVEL

What is Green Urbanism? Holistic Principles to Transform Cities for Sustainability

Sydney is Planning to Spread Out … Is It Sustainable?

Pedestrian (and stroller) priority in Vancouver

The eco-city: ten key transport and planning dimensions for sustainable city development

Sustainability on the Urban Scale: ‘Green Urbanism’

Challenges to Urban Transport Sustainability and Smart Transport in a Tourist City: The Gold Coast, Australia

by Tan Yigitcanlar, Lawrence Fabian and Eddo Coiacetto

This paper aims to identify challenges to achieving sustainable and smart transport in a city whose form has been produced mainly by tourism urbanisation: the Gold Coast, Australia. The first part of the paper investigates urban transport sustainability, reviewing how urban density, travel behaviour and lifestyles, and the availability of various transportation services and modes influence urban transport sustainability. This is followed by an empirical analysis of transport trends, modal splits, and basic community profiles in the Gold Coast, to identify challenges to sustainable transport development therein. The paper also introduces and acknowledges potential positive outcomes of the current public transport policies and projects, and then explores the concept of smart transport focussing on automated people movers. The paper concludes by stating more actions for a sustainable transport system in the Gold Coast needs to be done including adaptation of smart transport options.


Coolangatta CBD at the very Southern end of the Gold Coast in Queensland, Australia, photo by Galleriestoday
Gold Coast, Australia, by Galleriestoday

Surfers Paradise in Gold Coast ,photo by Sarmu

 
more about urban Australia:

Skyline photos of Sydney, Australia (2)

Sustainability on the Urban Scale: ‘Green Urbanism’

Affordable Housing - theoretical utopia or achievable reality

Assessment of Garden City Planning Principles in the ACT

Evaluating urban transport and land use policies through the use of an accessibility modelling framework

Sydney Cycle Strategy: Building a Bicycle Friendly City

PhD of urban planning in The University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Design (MSD)

Halting Urban Sprawl: Smart Growth in Vancouver and Seattle

by David Fox

Haphazard and unorganized land-use planning in United States cities has resulted in endless sprawl that is straining infrastructure, polluting the atmosphere, and negatively affecting quality of life. This Note compares efforts of two similarly situated North American cities— Seattle and Vancouver—in enacting Smart Growth policies to combat sprawl and argues that Seattle, and American cities in general, should look to Vancouver’s example to limit urban sprawl and comprehensively plan at local and regional levels for sustainable growth and more livable spaces over the coming decades.

The most pressing land use problem facing North American cities is the containment of urban sprawl.1 Sprawl is low-density, land-consuming, non-contiguous development on the fringe of settled areas, often near a decaying central city that invades undeveloped areas.2 It is haphazard development that expands without limits or order from the core of a metropolitan area.3 In areas characterized by sprawl, residential development consists primarily of single-family housing, with a significant number of them scattered in distant areas.4 Examples of non-residential development include shopping malls, strip malls along arterial roads, isolated industrial and office parks, and freestanding schools or other public buildings.5 Sprawl usually results in infrastructure problems.6 Ei-ther the infrastructure (sewage and water distribution systems are examples)
is unavailable in the outer areas where development is taking place, or an entirely separate system must be developed, which is economically wasteful and inefficient.7 By concentrating poverty in urbanized areas, sprawl re-segregates society and drains public investment in vital urban services.8

A bird-eye view of Vancouver, by ecstaticist
Urban sprawl in Vancouver, photo by Aphex Twin

similar posts about urban and suburban sprawl:

New Austin blueprint envisions new direction for growth

Is `new urbanism' truly a step in right direction?

Iraq's urban sprawl, not looting, threatens Ninevah antiquities

A Libertarian View of Urban Sprawl

Study Shows Urban Sprawl Continues To Gobble Up Land

SHRINKING CITIES—Growing Domain for Urban Planning?

Cleanliness from a car

PRESERVING COST-EFFICIENT INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPLY IN SHRINKING CITIES

Monday, January 23, 2012

Residential Areas for Households without Cars The Scope for Neighbourhood Mobility Management in Scandinavian Cities

by Jan Scheurer

Ecological housing initiatives have proliferated throughout Scandinavia over the past two decades and fostered groundbreaking innovation in the fields of resource efficiency and the reinvigoration of communities in local areas. The travel patterns of residents in such projects, however, remain largely outside the target and the influence of the policy context, and thus constitute an unpredictable 'wildcard' with the potential to seriously jeopardise the sustainability performance even of an otherwise highly innovative neighbourhood. To overcome such shortfalls, recent experiments in some European cities have attempted to incorporate mobility management components into the concepts of new residential developments. These include restricted or demand-responsive parking provision, on-site car sharing, rent and mobility service packages, and specific designs for live-work arrangements and/or functional integration on a neighbourhood level.
Some of these carfree or car-reduced neighbourhoods have now been completed and inhabited for several years. Their history, leading up to a location-specific mobility concept in each case, and their experience with practical implementation and user compliance now allow to provide a critical review of success and failure in this field, and to draw conclusions on how similar approaches may be applied in Scandinavian cities.

A pedestrian street in old town of Stockholm, photo by Joakim Johansson (Alendri)

A pedestrian street in  Stockholm, photo by Design for Health

more about urban travels:

Urban form, individual spatial footprints, and travel: An examination of space-use behavior

COLLECTING SOCIAL NETWORK DATA TO STUDY SOCIAL ACTIVITY-TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR: AN EGOCENTRIC APPROACH

Transitography 101: The Portland Metro – A Case Study on Regional Government

Neighborhood Design and the Accessibility of the Elderly: An Empirical Analysis in Northern California

OVERVIEW OF LAND-USE TRANSPORT MODELS

Building More Roads Does Not Ease Congestion

BEST PRACTICE IN FACILITATING AND PROMOTING ACTIVE TRAVEL

via Department for Regional Development

“Policies and strategies at all levels advocate walking and cycling but motor transport still takes priority in the big decisions and in the allocation of investment. As a consequence the UK lags badly behind many European countries in levels of active travel. To return walking and cycling to levels that can contribute to a healthy society, changes are needed in policy and practice.”1
A number of papers exist summarising the success of The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany in promoting active travel, especially cycling. Pucher et al Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany, 2008;2 Buehler et al Sustainable Transport that Works: Lessons from Germany, 2009;3 Atkins, European Best Practice Report, 2006;4 Jacobs Consultancy, European Best Practice Report, Final Report December 2006.5 Some of these successes are discussed in more detail in the next section.

German bikers, by Qlis

more about travel behavior in urban areas:

OVERVIEW OF LAND-USE TRANSPORT MODELS

Building More Roads Does Not Ease Congestion

How Urban Design Affect Personal Activity and Travel Choice - An Analysis of Travel Data from Sample Communities in Adelaide

Effects of Site Design on Pedestrian Travel in Mixed-Use, Medium-Density Environments

Comparative Study of Pedestrian Travel Culture in Different Cities in Japan

What is Green Urbanism? Holistic Principles to Transform Cities for Sustainability

by Steffen Lehmann

Over the last thirty-five years or so, an international debate on eco-city theory has emerged and has developed as a relevant research field concerning the future of urbanism and the city itself. During that time, a number of architectural schools of thought have been implemented worldwide. One such school is Technical Utopianism (a technological idealism that relied on the quick `techno-fix’, as expressed, for instance, in the work of Archigram).
Other early writing on green urbanism was available from Ebenezer Howard, whose 1902 book was entitled `Garden City of Tomorrow’, and whose political and social agenda has recently made a comeback. Much later, in 1969, Reyner Banham pioneered the idea that technology, human needs and environmental concerns should be considered an integral part of architecture. Probably no historian before him had so systematically explored the impact of environmental engineering and services on the design of buildings. (Howard, 1902; Banham, 1969) Some other early significant writing on green urbanism has come from Lewis Mumford and Jane Jacobs – although they didn’t call it green urbanism. From `Silent Spring’ (by Rachel Carson, 1962), to Victor Olgyay’s `Design with Climate’ (1963), to Reyner Banham’s `Architecture of the Well-tempered Environment’ (1969), to Ian McHarg’s `Design with Nature’ (1969), to the pivotal publications by authors re-connecting urbanism with the climatic condition (such as Koenigsberger, Drew and Fry, or Szokolay, in publications in the 1970s and 80s), to the remarkable `Brundtland Report’ (Brundtland, 1987); the important contributions from Robert and Brenda Vale (`Green Architecture: Design for an Energyconscious Future’, 1991), and the `Solar City Charter’ (Herzog et al, 1995/2007), the field of sustainable city theories and climate-responsive urbanism has constantly been expanded.
An important contribution came from Guenther Moewes with his book `Weder Huetten noch Palaeste’ (1995), which is a programmatic manifesto for designing and constructing longer-lasting buildings. More recent theories for `Compact Cities’ and `Solar Cities’ (Burton, 1997; Jenks and Burgess, 2000; Lehmann, 2005) encapsulate the visions based on the belief that urban revitalization and the future of the city can only be achieved through `recompacting’ and using clearly formulated sustainable urban design principles. These principles for achieving green urbanism have to be clearly defined and adjusted to an era of rapid urbanization, especially in the Asia-Pacific Region. In the 21st century we are working in an entirely new context, for which we need new types of cities. As noted by Ulrich Beck, we have arrived in `a new era of uncertainty’, where energy, water and food supply are critical. ‘We live in a world of increasingly non-calculable uncertainty that we create with the same speed of its technological developments.’ (Beck, 2000)

Sir Ebenezer Howard, by Mr Gue

more about urban sustainability:

Urban Sprawl and Atlanta’s Air Quality Problems

STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES FOR TEHRAN

The Münster Application for the European Green Capital Award

Capturing Sao Paulo's Sidewalks

A Garden City Without A Garden!

Sustainable Urban Planning

Urban Planning and Real Estate Development

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Germany Sets Aside $130 Billion for Renewable Energy

By John C.K. Daly

Germany is already the world's strongest photovoltaic market and also accounts for Europe's largest share of installed wind capacity. Moving resolutely into the field of renewable energy, by 2020, renewable energy sources are expected to account for 35 percent of Germany's energy output, soaring to 80 percent by 2050. Germany now produces 20 percent of its electricity from renewable energy sources, now, up from just 6 percent in 2000. The effort is in turn creating thousands of jobs and new industries.
Industry expert Tobias Homann observed, "With the decision to abandon nuclear power earlier this year, it was clear that the road ahead would be challenging. But Germany is in a very promising position to be the first industrialized country to rely entirely on renewable energy."
One of the current major shortfalls of the renewable energy market is its inability to store generated energy but Germany is working on this dilemma, focusing on the development of battery and smart grid technology.
According to Germany Trade & Invest CEO Jurgen Friedrich, "Germany has established the ideal prerequisites for the rapid development of the energy storage industry. The unique combination of renewable energy generation, innovation and implementation through such projects makes Germany an optimal location for companies looking to enter this budding industry."
Germany is also assiduously pursuing improving solar technology. Germany's photovoltaic installations and solar facilities recently surpassed hydropower in Germany's total energy generation matrix.
In the area of offshore wind power generation, Germany projects 4,000 turbines off its Baltic coast producing electricity by 2030. Germany's northeastern Mecklenburg-Vorpommern state on the Baltic will produce 100 percent of its electricity from renewables by 2015-2017, and then export the excess to other German states. Mecklenburg-Vorpommern premier Erwin Selling told reporters, "Renewable energy has become extremely valuable for our state. It's just a great opportunity - producing renewable energy and creating manufacturing jobs.
 
A wind tower near Dortmund, Germany

more about energy:

Dortmund Light Rail Developments, Germany


Aside from plentiful services on the IC/ICE networks centred on the soon-to-be rebuilt Dortmund Hauptbahnhof (handling 150,000 daily); heavy rail routes provide much local transport through DB's S-Bahn and regional operations. However, higher frequencies and closer stops are available on the commuter services of the local utilities group, Dortmunder Stadtwerke AG, branded as DSW21.
With so many interests in the area, including 'Dortmund Airport 21', 13km (8 miles) to the east and the suspended H-Bahn system at Dortmund University, DSW21 has a clear view of its role: "To set the city in motion. Over 127 million customers use the well-structured network of buses, trams and trains every year".
Less overtly anti-car than is normal when public transport is being promoted, the authority operates a parking guidance system to direct drivers to one of 7,600 parking places in 14 multi-storey or underground car parks.

Inside a Dortmunder U-Bahn wagon, line 42, Grevel-Hombruch, developed in 1980s
INFRASTRUCTURE

DSW21's rail-based transport is of two standard gauge types. The majority stems from the attempt in the 1960s to establish an inter-urban light rail system (Stadtbahn) to connect and pass through the centres of adjoining cities in the Rhein-Ruhr region.
Although not realised on the regional front, as with fellow NRW city Düsseldorf, the scheme did yield a core high-floor 'supertram' operation largely devoid of road conflicts and only emerging from tunnels (totalling 17.5km) when away from the city centre.
Routes are on two in-tunnel lines that cross at Stadtgarten Interchange in central Dortmund, linked at the southern end near the Westfalenhallen and Westfalenstadion (Signal Iduna Park) entertainments area just to the south. This link avoids reversal, with routes switching identities as they return along the tunnel opposite that on which they arrived. Branches from the two core lines provide six 'U'-designated Stadtbahn routes.
The other mode is represented by the two tram routes on a branching double-track section on an east-west axis, survivors of a vastly bigger system. Segregated from the Stadtbahn except at the common Dorstfeld depot, the 403/404 services (to be re-designated as U43/U44) are due to be being rerouted in 2008 via a new 2.3km (1.4 mile) tunnel between Ostentor and and Heinrichstrasse. 


more about Germany:

The Münster Application for the European Green Capital Award

Bicycle policies of the European principals: continuous and integral

Artbase Grabowsee – Urban Art Festival

The International Doctorate Programme European Urban Studies (IPP-EU), Bauhaus University, Weimar, Germany

The streets of central city of Aachen, Germany

The pedestrian streets of Bochum central city

BEYOND GROWTH – URBAN DEVELOPMENT IN SHRINKING CITIES AS A CHALLENGE FOR MODELING APPROACHES

Bicycle Use and Safety In Paris, Boston, and Amsterdam

by J. Scott Osberg and Sarah C. Stiles

This article examines bicycle use and safety behavior in Paris, Boston, and Amsterdam. Population-adjusted bicycle and passenger car death rates in France, the United States, and The Netherlands provide context for understanding bicycle use and safety behavior. Observation data on helmet use and use of lights at night are also presented. Boston has the fewest bicycles per hour at 55, Paris is next at 74, compared to 242 cyclists per hour in Amsterdam. Thirty-two percent of Boston cyclists wore helmets versus only 2.4% of Paris cyclists and only 0.1% of Amsterdam cyclists. In contrast, Paris cyclists were far more likely to use lights at night (45.2%), than Boston cyclists (15.6%) or Amsterdam cyclists (7.6%). With bicycle and car deaths as the numerators, and the French, U.S., and Dutch populations as the denominators, the Netherlands appears to have a dramatically lower death rate for people in passenger cars and for the combined group of cyclists and passenger car occupants. Transportation safety policies in the Netherlands appear to be working better than policies in the U.S. or France. Politicians, transportation planners, and safety experts can learn a lot from the Dutch about how to promote cycling and build a safe bicyclefriendly environment.


Amsterdam cyclists:


more about bicycle planning:

The Münster Application for the European Green Capital Award

Bicycle policies of the European principals: continuous and integral

Sights and details from the 2011 NJ Bike and Walk Summit

On Amsterdam, bikes and the Copenhagen Wheel thingy

Metroradruhr: Germany's Ruhr Valley Inter-City Bike Sharing

Saturday, January 21, 2012

The Münster Application for the European Green Capital Award

 European Green Capital

In Münster, bicycle transport is top priority. The entire municipal area is criss-crossed by a coherent network of safe bicycle trails, making the use of the bicycle as a means of travel so unique. In the German bicycle capital, there were designated bicycle lanes with an overall length of 304 kilometres in the year 2007. Three years before, this had been 270 kilometres, corresponding to an increment of 12.6%. Additionally, there are some 500 km of access routes including some 200 km of tracks through green spaces, serving the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists alike. The fact that the citizens of Münster make use of the area-wide bicycle lane network gladly and frequently is due to three factors:
• the manageability of the city, with its bicyclist-friendly topography
• the installation of 304 km of separate bicycle lanes along all main artery roads (resolution in principle),
• the car-free promenade of 4.5 km all around the old town which is reserved for cyclists and pedestrians and fulfils important functions as a link and distributor (up to 1,500 bicyclists per hour (at peak times) make use of this “bicycle highway”). The relation to the total number of inhabitants (280.000) to the designated cycle lanes is equivalent to 2,87 Meter per inhabitant. 
Further important factors for network coherence are:
•the interconnection of the main artery roads with dedicated bicycle tracks
•the junction point solutions taking into account bicycle track routeing and dedicated signalling for bicyclists,
•the integration with all residential areas (with area-wide speed limit of 30)
•the integration within the city centre - with partially limited clearance of the pedestrian precincts for bicyclists, and
• the implementation of bicycle parking offers for short-term and long-term parkers.


Cyclists from Münster, Germany:



more about Germany:

Bicycle policies of the European principals: continuous and integral

Lessons from Freiburg on Creating a Sustainable Urban Community

Brief History of Berlin

Artbase Grabowsee – Urban Art Festival

Skyline photos of Düsseldorf, Germany

The pedestrian streets of Bochum central city

Metroradruhr: Germany's Ruhr Valley Inter-City Bike Sharing

Innovative Urban Transport Concepts Moving from Theory to Practice

karlsruhe: a ride on the "tram-trains"

Bicycle policies of the European principals: continuous and integral

 A Fietsberaad Publication

The ten reports presented here are chiefly specifications of the general trend of ‘continuous’ and ‘integral’. Each town has its own story, with a different emphasis due to particularly local circumstances. The similarities and differences between the ten reports will be analysed in more detail at the end of this publication, in chapter 12. Ten cities with respectable bicycle use.
Often higher bicycle percentages are claimed. Upon closer examination, however, these only refer to local trips within municipal boundaries, or specific segments like commuter traffic. The table above and the national surveys below only provide data that are known to relate to the bicycle percentage in all trips (by inhabitants of the town or country concerned). These figures are derived from many sources; at least two per town (minor differences having been erased).
The Netherlands, Denmark, Germany and Belgium are the countries with the highest bicycle use in Europe. Within these countries, the ten cities discussed here really are foremost as far as bicycle use is concerned. Bicycle use in these countries and cities is of an altogether different level than elsewhere in Europe:
• In The Netherlands the bicycle percentage in the model split has been approx. 26% over the last decades. The top cities score between 35% and 40%; cities with the lowest bicycle use rank between 15% and 20%.
• In Denmark the bicycle percentage is between 15 and 20%. Differences in bicycle use between the cities are relatively small; bicycle use in the cities is quite commonly at a level of 20% of all trips. Only Odense and Copenhagen (far) surpass this: Odense approx. 26% and Copenhagen nearer to 32%.
• In Germany on average 10% of all trips are made by bicycle. The western federal states have a higher average bicycle use, especially Nordrhein-Westfalen. Next to Münster and Freiburg there are more cities with bicycle percentages between 20% and 30% there. In other federal states bicycles are by no means absent either; Berlin for instance has a bicycle percentage of approx. 10%.
• Belgium has an average bicycle percentage of not much more than 8%. Many cities in Flanders approach the level of Ghent: somewhat over 15%. The town of Bruges even has a slightly higher bicycle percentage.

Although average bicycle use is much lower in other European countries, there are some striking extremes:
• In Great Britain bicycle use is on average only 2% (London even slightly lower), but there are several incidental cases with a much higher degree of bicycle use (York and Hull 11%, Oxford and particularly Cambridge close to 20%). A similar pattern – even slightly more extreme – can be discerned in Sweden and especially Italy.
• Ireland scores 3% - 4%, with virtually no upward extremes (Dublin 5% at most).
• In Sweden bicycle use is on average 7% of all trips; for cities this is 10%. Peaks: Lund and Malmö 20%. The small town of VästerÃ¥s (115,000 inhabitants) has an incredible 33% bicycle percentage according to a source quoted time and time again.
• In the Czech Republic, as in other Eastern European countries, there are a few cities with some degree of bicycle use (Ostrava, Olomouc and Ceské Budejovice, between 5% and 10%) and some with an even higher bicycle use (Prostejov 20%). However, average use is low: far below 5%.
• Austria has an average bicycle percentage of 9%, with Graz (14%) and Salzburg (19%) as extremes.
• Switzerland scores approximately 11% for bicycle use, with several cities at a slightly higher level, like Bern (15%), Basel (17%) and particularly Winterthur (approx. 20%).
• France has a low average bicycle use (5%), nor has it many extremes: Strasbourg 12%, Avignon 10%.
• Although in Italy average bicycle use is as low as 5% , with Rome even far below 1%, there are a number of striking exceptions. Especially the Po valley, with cities like Parma (over 15%) and with Ferrara as the best-known extreme example: around 30% bicycle percentage. Another remarkable town elsewhere in Italy is Florence (over 20%).


pictures of bicycle parking in Münster (Muenster), Germany:
 







more about bicycle planning:

Rent an electric bike in London

Travelwise: Bike sharing around the world

Sights and details from the 2011 NJ Bike and Walk Summit

On Amsterdam, bikes and the Copenhagen Wheel thingy

The Public transport and priority to pedestrians and bicycles as a basis for the quality of life in capital cities

Urban Bikeway Design Guide Released

NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide

Underground Prague Highway should save the Wenceslas Square

via ABCPrague

In two years, the most hated part of expressways in the Czech Republic, the heritage of the communists which cuts the Czech nation on the Wenceslas Square from their National Museum should be gone. The traffic, which torments the upper part of the Wenceslas Square should be moved to underground in two years. The Prague City hall and Prague 2 argue about how long the tunnel should be. Meanwhile the city representatives want it only at the National Museum, Prague 2 would like to see the tunnel reaching Nuselsky most.


Photos of Wenceslas Square:



more about urban transportation in Europe:

TRANSPORT POLICIES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE

Rent an electric bike in London

What's In A Name: Branding Rail Travel

TRANSPORT POLICIES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE

via PEPPER

The formerly socialist countries of Central and Eastern Europe have observed profound political and economic changes because the demise of Communism within the late 1980s and early 1990s. Each country features its own particular good reputation for transformation to some freer, more democratic, more market-based society. The timing and particular circumstances from the revolutions in each country vary. To this day, there are considerable differences among countries within the extent that their political systems are fully democratic and just how market-based their economies are. Thus, it’s kind of risky to generalize relating to this group of diverse countries.
Without exception, however, every formerly socialist country in Central and Eastern Europe has a minimum of moved toward greater democracy and greater market orientation. In each and every country, that political economic shift has produced a corresponding transport revolution. The obvious indicator of this revolution may be the dramatic development in levels of private car ownership and employ, and a corresponding decline in public places transport use. The modal transfer of passenger transport is reflected in most countries by similar alterations in goods transport, with substantial shifts from publicly managed rail transport to privately operated and operated trucking firms. As the increasing reliance upon roadway transport had already begun during the old age of the socialist era, the movement toward market-based capitalism greatly accelerated it, prompted by striking alterations in government transport policies. Indeed, a vital thesis of the overview is the fact that policy changes were accountable for virtually all of the enormous changes seen in Central and Eastern Europe from 1988 with the 1990s, demonstrating how crucially policies affect every factor of our transport systems.
This review concentrates on three Central Countries in Europe for detailed analysis: the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland. We include the former East Germany, whose political, economic, social, and transport systems dramatically changed after German reunification in 1990. Those four formerly socialist countries possess the most reliable long-term number of transport statistics, enabling better analysis of the transport systems, travel behaviour. Moreover, they’re typical of developments in other Central and Eastern Countries in Europe as well, with many transport trends finding yourself in the same direction whether or not the magnitudes vary from one country to a different. This overview is restricted mainly to urban passenger transport, although we briefly note developments in long-distance passenger travel and goods transport too. 
 

Pictures of old trams in Prague:









more about public transportation:

Skyline photos of Prague, Czech Republic (1)

















more skyline photos:

Skyline photos of Sydney, Australia (2)

Skyline photos of Barcelona 1  

Skyline photos of Brussels, Belgium -1

Skyline photos of Düsseldorf, Germany

Skyline photos of Manchester 1